PubMed · 17078127
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Paula Hensler. 2006-10-31. Viewpoint: Gender differences in heart disease.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17078127/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: Many emergency department (ED) patients with potential acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have prior visits and prior cardiac testing; however, the effect of knowledge of prior testing on the emergency physician disposition decision making is not known. We studied the impact of prior noninvasive testing (ie, stress testing) for myocardial ischemia on disposition decision making in ED patients with potential ACS. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of ED patients with chest pain who received an electrocardiogram for potential ACS. Data included demographics, medical history, stress test history, and TIMI risk score. Patients were followed in-house; 30-day telephone interviews were performed for follow-up. Main outcomes were ED disposition (admit/discharge) and a composite of 30-day death, acute myocardial infarction, and revascularization stratified on the basis of prior stress testing known at the time of presentation. Standard statistical techniques were used with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: There were 1853 patients enrolled and 97% had follow-up. Patients had a mean age of 53 +/- 14 years; 60% were women, 67% were black. There were 1491 (79%) patients without a prior stress test, 291 (16%) had a normal prior stress test result, and 89 (5%) had an abnormal prior stress test result. Admission rates were 92% (95% CI, 87%-98%) for patients with a prior abnormal stress test, 73% (95% CI, 67%-78%) for patients with a normal prior stress test, and 70% (95% CI, 67%-72%) for patients without a prior stress test. Adverse outcomes were the highest among patients with prior abnormal stress test but did not differ significantly between patients with no prior stress test and patients with prior normal stress test (10.1% [95% CI, 3.6-16.7%] vs 5.2% [95% CI, 4.1-6.4%] vs 4.8% [95% CI, 2.4-7.3%]). CONCLUSION: Patients without prior stress tests and patients with prior normal stress tests were admitted for potential ACS at the same rate and had the same 30-day cardiovascular event rates. This suggests that prior stress testing does not affect subsequent disposition decisions. Perhaps cardiac catheterization or computed tomography coronary angiograms would have more of an impact on subsequent visits, making them potentially more cost-effective in the low-risk patient.
The mechanism of chest pain in spontaneous pneumothorax has never been discussed in the literature. It is proposed that this is due to acute parietal pleural irritation secondary to leakage of inflammatory material following bleb rupture, rather than the presence of interpleural air.
The prognostic value of systemic endothelial dysfunction still remains uncertain in ischemic heart disease. The aim of the study was to establish the prognostic value of ultrasonically assessed systemic endothelial dysfunction in patients with chest pain syndrome and to assess whether this information was incremental to that already provided by simple parameters derived from echocardiography, such as left ventricular mass index or ejection fraction. One hundred ninety-five in-hospital patients (age=60+/-10 years; 63 females) with known or suspected CAD have been enrolled. All of the patients underwent, on different days, coronary angiography, endothelium-dependent FMD testing of the brachial artery by high-resolution ultrasound and resting 2D-echocardiography evaluation. The result of the FMD has been defined as the percent change in the internal diameter of the brachial artery during reactive hyperemia related to baseline. All patients were followed-up for a median of 27 months. During follow-up there were 17 deaths (9 cardiac), 4 non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and 18 late clinically-driven revascularization procedures. By a multivariate analysis, echocardiographically assessed ejection fraction (odds ratio: 2.32; 95% confidence interval: 1.24-4.33; p=0.008) and angiographically assessed CAD (odds ratio: 2.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.40-5.67; p=0.003), were independent prognostic predictors of events. In patients with known or suspected CAD, systemic endothelial dysfunction did not show a significant prognostic value. Echocardiographic indices of structural left ventricular damage appear to have a stronger prognostic value than functional indices of peripheral vascular damage in risk stratifying ischemic patients.