PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17080101

Structural requirements for a successful chronic peritoneal dialysis program.

Abstract

Recently, there has been a decline in chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) utilization in several countries. And, in these countries, the percent of patients with end-sage renal disease maintained on CPD is less than nephrologists think is appropriate. The reasons for these problems are uncertain, but it is likely that difficulties with the structural organization of CPD facilities play a contributory role. This paper discusses the structural requirements for a successful CPD program, focusing attention on the following domains: (1) adequate chronic kidney disease education, (2) provision and support of physician training in the principles and practice of CPD, (3) adequate size and organization of CPD centers, (4) development of appropriate support systems within the CPD facility, and (5) development of appropriate continuous quality improvement programs to monitor a variety of domains, including adequacy of dialysis, peritonitis rates, catheter infections and problems, psychosocial status of patients, etc.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F O Finkelstein. 2006. Structural requirements for a successful chronic peritoneal dialysis program.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5001927

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Patient safety in the dialysis facility.

Medical mistakes that harm patients have occurred in dialysis facilities, just as they have been reported to cause death in hospitals. A plan to recognize and prevent mistakes includes several elements. (1) Establish a culture of safety, where safe practices are a priority and reporting of adverse events and 'near misses' is encouraged in a non-punitive environment. (2) Redesign processes of care to minimize patient falls, medication errors, bleeding from vascular accesses, dialyzer reuse errors and other problems. (3) Perform root cause analyses of adverse events and 'near misses'. (4) Involve patients in safety efforts, including maintaining an accurate, up-to-date medication list. (5) Dialysis facilities should function as high-reliability organizations, focusing on the possibility of failures, expecting to make errors, training to recognize and recover from them and making system reforms following root cause analyses.

Hemodialysis Units, Hospital↗

[Quality control systems implementation in the Spanish Dialysis Units].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and analyze the implementation of a Quality Management Systems (QMS) and the use of Clinical Performance measures by the Nephrology Services and Hemodialysis Units in Spain. METHOD: The Quality Management Work Group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN) realized a survey that was directed to all the Spanish Nephrology Services and Hemodialysis Units. No exclusion criteria were defined for the study. The survey was based on a multichotomous self completing "Ad Hoc" questionnaire. RESULTS: The survey was answered by 46.7% of the polled centers (44.5% were public hospitals and 55.5% private centers). Of those replying the survey 70 % had a QMS, with a higher implementation in the area of Hemodialysis (HD). The ISO 9001-2000 was the prefer QMS model chosen by 76.4% of the centers. 68.6% of the centers with a QMS were certified by an external Auditing Group. 91.7% of the Nephrology Services and Hemodialysis units were using some clinical practice guideline. A high percentage of the centers had medical protocols and nursing plans (> 90%). A significantly higher implementation of QMS was observed in Private Hospitals and Hemodialysis Units (88.8 %) when compared to public Hospitals (46.1%) (X2: 31.5; p < 0.001). The ISO 9000 Standard certification was selected by 78,3% of the private centers and by 21,7% of the public centers (X2: 37.3; p < 0.001). The certification or accreditation were done by an external auditing group in 68. 1% of the private centers compared to 31.9% for the public Hospitals (X2: 24.8; p < 0.001). Although the rate of answers prevents from extracting definitive conclusions, the result seems to indicate that in the Spanish Nephrology Community a clear trend exists towards the use QMS. This tendency suggests, that in the near future, there will be a progressive implementation and routine use of QMS in the Nephrology Community in Spain.

Hemodialysis Units, Hospital↗