PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17095442

Crossing boundaries: implementing an interprofessional module into uniprofessional Bachelor programmes.

Abstract

In accordance with the curriculum reforms within health education in Norway, the Faculty of Health Sciences at Oslo University College introduced in 1998 an interprofessional module, entitled "VEKS", for eight different professional programmes. A shared module of 30 credits (15 for technically oriented programmes) was introduced into the three-year programmes. A problem-based and project-oriented format was chosen as the teaching and learning model to enhance the interactive, experiential and collaborative learning. This paper describes experience gained during the five-year implementation period. Empirical data were collected through participatory observations, students' and tutors' evaluations and group interviews with tutors and faculty leaders. The innovative project described challenged traditional educational boundaries and structures, frames of thought and habits. It broadened perspectives within the particular professional programmes as well as preparing students for their future professional careers. Lessons learned can be summed up as: Time, resources and a certain staff consensus are needed to deal with and overcome traditions and attitudes, the students' learning is a socialization process which needs to be developed over time; intermittent interprofessional interventions during the three-year period was found to be inadequate, and the tutor role is essential in order to support the students' learning process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gerd Bjørke, Nina E Haavie. 2006. Crossing boundaries: implementing an interprofessional module into uniprofessional Bachelor programmes.. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820600991801

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Shared decision-making, gender and new technologies.

Much discussion of decision-making processes in medicine has been patient-centred. It has been assumed that there is, most often, one patient. Less attention has been given to shared decision-making processes where two or more patients are involved. This article aims to contribute to this special area. What conditions need to be met if decision-making can be said to be shared? What is a shared decision-making process and what is a shared autonomous decision-making process? Why make the distinction? Examples are drawn from the area of new reproductive medicine and clinical genetics. Possible gender-differences in shared decision-making are discussed.

Cooperative Behavior↗

Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: what does information systems offer medical informatics?

The effective use of information technology (IT) is a crucial component for the delivery of effective services in health care. Current approaches to medical informatics (MI) research have significantly contributed to the success of IT use in health care but important challenges remain to be addressed. We believe that expanding the multi-disciplinary basis for MI research is important to meeting these research challenges. In this paper, we outline theories and methods used in information systems (IS) research that we believe can inform our understanding of health care IT applications and outcomes. To do so, we discuss some general differences in the focus and methods of MI and IS research to identify broad opportunities. We then review conceptual and methodological approaches in IS that have been applied in health care IT research. These include: technology-use mediation, collaborative work, genre theory, interpretive research, action research, and modeling. Examples of these theories and methods in healthcare IS research are illustrated.

Cooperative Behavior↗

The role of the situation in leadership.

Leadership depends on the situation. Few social scientists would dispute the validity of this statement. But the statement can be interpreted in many different ways, depending, at least in part, on what one means by leadership. This article begins with a definition of leadership and a brief description of 3 historically important theories of leadership. The most recent of these, contingency theories, is argued to be most consistent with existing evidence and most relevant to professional practice. The Vroom, Yetton, and Jago contingency models of participation in decision making are described in depth, and their work provides the basis for identifying 3 distinct ways in which situational or contextual variables are relevant to both research on and the practice of leadership.

Cooperative Behavior↗