G-protein coupled receptor structure.

Philip L Yeagle; Arlene D Albert

doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.10.002

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 17097603

G-protein coupled receptor structure.

Philip L Yeagle·Arlene D Albert

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Because of their central role in regulation of cellular function, structure/function relationships for G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) are of vital importance, yet only recently have sufficient data been obtained to begin mapping those relationships. GPCRs regulate a wide range of cellular processes, including the senses of taste, smell, and vision, and control a myriad of intracellular signaling systems in response to external stimuli. Many diseases are linked to GPCRs. A critical need exists for structural information to inform studies on mechanism of receptor action and regulation. X-ray crystal structures of only one GPCR, in an inactive state, have been obtained to date. However considerable structural information for a variety of GPCRs has been obtained using non-crystallographic approaches. This review begins with a review of the very earliest GPCR structural information, mostly derived from rhodopsin. Because of the difficulty in crystallizing GPCRs for X-ray crystallography, the extensive published work utilizing alternative approaches to GPCR structure is reviewed, including determination of three-dimensional structure from sparse constraints. The available X-ray crystallographic analyses on bovine rhodopsin are reviewed as the only available high-resolution structures for any GPCR. Structural information available on ligand binding to several receptors is included. The limited information on excited states of receptors is also reviewed. It is concluded that while considerable basic structural information has been obtained, more data are needed to describe the molecular mechanism of activation of a GPCR.

Explore related subjects

Crystallography, X-Ray Humans Protein Conformation Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Philip L Yeagle, Arlene D Albert. 2006-10-10. G-protein coupled receptor structure.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.10.002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Prediction of side-chain conformations on protein surfaces.

An approach is described that improves the prediction of the conformations of surface side chains in crystal structures, given the main-chain conformation of a protein. A key element of the methodology involves the use of the colony energy. This phenomenological term favors conformations found in frequently sampled regions, thereby approximating entropic effects and serving to smooth the potential energy surface. Use of the colony energy significantly improves prediction accuracy for surface side chains with little additional computational cost. Prediction accuracy was quantified as the percentage of side-chain dihedral angles predicted to be within 40 degrees of the angles measured by X-ray diffraction. Use of the colony energy in predictions for single side chains improved the prediction accuracy for chi(1) and chi(1+2) from 65 and 40% to 74 and 59%, respectively. Several other factors that affect prediction of surface side-chain conformations were also analyzed, including the extent of conformational sampling, details of the rotamer library employed, and accounting for the crystallographic environment. The prediction of conformations for polar residues on the surface was generally found to be more difficult than those for hydrophobic residues, except for polar residues participating in hydrogen bonds with other protein groups. For surface residues with hydrogen-bonded side chains, the prediction accuracy of chi(1) and chi(1+2) was 79 and 63%, respectively. For surface polar residues, in general (all side-chain prediction), the accuracy of chi(1) and chi(1+2) was only 73 and 56%, respectively. The most accurate results were obtained using the colony energy and an all-atom description that includes neighboring molecules in the crystal (protein chains and hetero atoms). Here, the accuracy of chi(1) and chi(1+2) predictions for surface side chains was 82 and 73%, respectively. The root mean square deviations obtained for hydrogen-bonding surface side chains were 1.64 and 1.81 A, with and without consideration of crystal packing effects, respectively.

Crystallography, X-Ray↗

PubMed2007

Double-stranded cycles: toward C84's belt region.

The reactivity of the double-stranded hydrocarbon cycle with two ether bridges (1) toward iodotrimethylsilane (TMSI) was investigated in some detail. The carbon skeleton of cycle 1 resembles the belt region of a C84 fullerene which makes it a potential precursor to the long sought after fully aromatic derivative. Upon exposure to TMSI, cycle 1 undergoes a cascade of reactions which involve different states of iodination/reduction which ultimately lead to the hydrogenated cycle 5a, whose structure was proven by single-crystal X-ray analysis. A deeper insight into mechanistic aspects of this sequence of conversions was gained by performing the reaction under dry and wet conditions, whereby the latter involved both normal and deuterated water. With the help of detailed NMR correlation studies and DFT computations, all important aspects were clarified including an unexpected selective H/D exchange at the naphthalenic moieties.

Crystallography, X-Ray↗

PubMed2007

Enantiopure pseudo-C3-symmetric titanium alkoxide with propeller-like chirality.

An enantiopure amine tris(phenolate) ligand containing a single stereogenic center has been used to control the propeller-like chirality of a derived pseudo-C3-symmetric titanium isopropoxide complex with excellent levels of diastereocontrol. [structure: see text].

Crystallography, X-Ray↗