PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17102816

Normal tissue radiosensitivity: prediction on deterministic or stochastic basis?

Abstract

For the same standardized physical radiation dose there is considerable variation, among different patients, of the magnitude of early and late normal tissue reactions. Technical and clinical factors account for about one third only of these variations. Genetic or epigenetic differences between patients account for the greater proportion of interpatient radiosensitivity differences. Attempts have been made to correlate differences in the tissue radiosensitivity with the in vitro radiosensitivity of fibroblasts or lymphocytes as well as with other biological cellular processes related to cell death (mainly DNA repair and chromosomal aberrations). Apart from some genetic diseases such as ataxia telangiectasia, there were positive results in some studies that could not be reproduced in others. It is now realized that for normal tissue radiation-induced morbidity (a) cell kill is not the only factor, (b) interaction with a large number of gene products, such as IL-2, IL-6, TGF-beta, is involved, and (c) radiosensitivity differences can reflect genetic differences. Polymorphism in a wide range of genes can now be demonstrated and analyzed as a source of variations in the radiation response. cDNA microarray procedures can also allow simultaneous measurement, in the same sample, of thousands of genes and thus avoiding basing the investigation on a restricted number of genes. Preliminary results could show retrospectively a correlation between late normal tissue reactions and expression of certain genes. Using cDNA microarray before radiotherapy to predict the occurrence of serious late reactions is still under consideration. Theoretically, an efficient predictor procedure may serve in (a) detection of hypersensitive patients before submitting them to highly toxic radiotherapy regimes such as whole body irradiation, (b) detection of hypersensitive patients in clinical situations where radiotherapy can be effectively replaced by other modalities, and (c) selection of patients for elaborate radiotherapy techniques involving dose escalation to high levels.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hassan K Awwad. 2005. Normal tissue radiosensitivity: prediction on deterministic or stochastic basis?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17102816/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Variability of bladder filling in patients receiving radical radiotherapy to the prostate.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients receiving radical radiotherapy to the prostate are requested to maintain a full bladder to displace the dome of the bladder and small bowel from the target volume. This study investigated patients' ability to consistently maintain a full bladder throughout planning and treatment before (Study 1) and after (Study 2) the introduction of a patient information sheet. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bladder volumes were measured on 41 patients at CT scanning, simulation and once weekly during treatment using a portable ultrasound device, BladderScan BVI 3000. Patients were asked their assessment of bladder fullness, time since last urination and the volume of fluid drank. A patient information sheet on bladder filling was then introduced and the study repeated on 25 patients (Study 2). The ultrasound bladder volumes measured at CT were compared to the CT scan data. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the ultrasound and CT bladder volumes r = 0.88 (P < 0.01). There was a significant decrease between the volume at CT (mean 362 ml, SD 229 ml) and treatment (mean 251 ml, SD 171 ml) in Study 1 (P = 0.002). In Study 2 the mean volume at CT was 286 ml (SD 164 ml) compared to a mean of 312 ml (SD 196 ml) during treatment. The measured volume correlated with patient self-assessment (r = 0.47, P < 0.01). The median volume drank by patients in Study 2 was 350 ml (range 50-825 ml) compared to 450 ml (range 75-1500 ml) in Study 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial results showed patients were unable to maintain a constant bladder volume during planning and treatment. Implementation of written bladder filling instructions was shown to improve bladder volume consistency.

Dose Fractionation, Radiation↗

Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as an alternative to conformal radiotherapy (CRT) or 4-field box boost (4FB) in women with gynecologic malignancies who are unsuitable for brachytherapy for technical or medical reasons. METHODS: Dosimetric and toxicity information was analyzed for 12 patients with cervical (8), endometrial (2) or vaginal (2) cancer previously treated with external beam pelvic radiotherapy and a CRT boost. Optimized IMRT boost treatment plans were then developed for each of the 12 patients and compared to CRT and 4FB plans. The plans were compared in terms of dose conformality and critical normal tissue avoidance. RESULTS: The median planning target volume (PTV) was 151 cm(3) (range 58-512 cm(3)). The median overlap of the contoured rectum with the PTV was 15 (1-56) %, and 11 (4-35) % for the bladder. Two of the 12 patients, both with large PTVs and large overlap of the contoured rectum and PTV, developed grade 3 rectal bleeding. The dose conformity was significantly improved with IMRT over CRT and 4FB (p < or = 0.001 for both). IMRT also yielded an overall improvement in the rectal and bladder dose-volume distributions relative to CRT and 4FB. The volume of rectum that received the highest doses (>66% of the prescription) was reduced by 22% (p < 0.001) with IMRT relative to 4FB, and the bladder volume was reduced by 19% (p < 0.001). This was at the expense of an increase in the volume of these organs receiving doses in the lowest range (<33%). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that IMRT can improve target coverage and reduce dose to critical structures in gynecologic patients receiving an external beam radiotherapy boost. This dosimetric advantage will be integrated with other patient and treatment-specific factors, particularly internal tumor movement during fractionated radiotherapy, in the context of a future image-guided radiation therapy study.

Dose Fractionation, Radiation↗

Defining the radiation target on a daily basis.

The delineation of the target volume for irradiation is a critical step in the radiotherapy process. Delivery of radiotherapy occurs over a fractionated course of many treatments. Variations in the position of the target volume may occur on a daily basis during treatment and so the procedure for defining the target volume on a single initial 'snapshot' computed tomography scan has been re-evaluated. Newer technologies of image-guided radiotherapy allow the development of on-line daily definition of the target volume prior to radiotherapy delivery.

Dose Fractionation, Radiation↗