PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 17108644

Clinical pathways development and computer support in the EPR: lessons learned.

Thomas Bürkle·Thomas Baur·Norbert Höss
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper refers to a project for development and optimization of a clinical pathway for the Lumbar Nerve Root Compression Syndrome. A special focus is taken on computer support for pathway development and implementation. An innovative combination of "rapid prototyping" of a workflow model and a 2 level approach using round robin methods in a large group and individual semi-structured interviews is presented. The method focuses on process optimization instead of process modeling and concentrates on areas of the workflow which may be optimized. Critical parts of the optimized clinical workflow have been implemented inside a commercial electronic patient record system.

Explore related subjects

Critical PathwaysGermanyHumansLumbosacral RegionMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedNerve Compression SyndromesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Thomas Bürkle, Thomas Baur, Norbert Höss. 2006. Clinical pathways development and computer support in the EPR: lessons learned.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17108644/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Clinical management. Design for living.

91 per cent of patients started treatment within two mounths of referral, compared to 70-80 per cent last year. The last five months has seen rapid progress at a rate of 2 per cent a month. Sustaining improvement depends on leadership, measurement and looking at the whole patient pathway.

Critical Pathways↗
PubMed2006

[Clinical pathways -- first results of a systematic IT-supported application at a surgical department of a university hospital].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In analogy to industrial process management, clinical pathways have been introduced for operational process organisation in orthopedic and interventional procedures as well as for conservative treatments. Within this study, introduction and continuous, systematic application of clinical pathways at a surgical department of a university hospital was investigated. METHODS: Analysis was performed by IT-based (SAP/i. s. h.med) evaluation of the registered data regarding pathway violations. Additionally, patients' records were matched with the computerized data for quality assurance of pathway documentation. RESULTS: 501 patients were entered in 16 clinical pathways (31 +/- 39 patients per pathway). The mean period from the introduction of a distinct pathway to the data acquisition of the present study ranged from 2 to 14 months (mean 7+/-7.5 months). Pathway violations correlated with the complexity, but not with the period since the pathway was introduced. Organisational reasons next to medical reasons (i. e. delayed gastric function or wound healing) were the most frequent causes for pathway violations. CONCLUSION: Clinical pathways may not only be realised for operative procedures or conservative treatments, but represent a clinical and administrative management instrument at a surgical department of a university hospital for daily work routine. They are suitable as an instrument for clinical quality and risk management, as an economic control instrument in reorganisation phases as well as in the routine of surgical clinics.

Critical Pathways↗