PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 17110726

Refusing to provide a prenatal test: can it ever be ethical?

Rony E Duncan·Bennett Foddy·Martin B Delatycki
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Ethics, MedicalFemaleGenetic TestingHumansHuntington DiseasePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRefusal to TreatJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rony E Duncan, Bennett Foddy, Martin B Delatycki. 2006-11-18. Refusing to provide a prenatal test: can it ever be ethical?. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38950.645799.55

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

[A separation of public health ethics from medical ethics].

Until now there are only a few approaches in the German-speaking realm to establish an explicit ethical framework for moral issues of public health--although a need for public health ethics in times of SARS and avian flu is obvious. One deficit of the discussion so far is that there is no systematic separation of medical ethics and public health ethics. Thus, the core and interdisciplinary focus of public health is often not met. However, to frame discussions of moral issues within a specific public health ethics framework seems to be fruitful. This paper deals with the conceptual differences of medical ethics and public health ethics. The discussion helps both applied ethical discourses to sharpen their focus and strengthen their appeal. The author develops and presents a conceptual and normative frame for public health ethics and offers a concise set of ethical principles for the discussion of moral challenges in public health.

Ethics, Medical↗