PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17147945

[Wrong-site surgery: incidence and prevention].

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This paper illustrates how reporting of adverse events can be used to introduce changes in an organization. Starting from reports of incidents on wrong-site surgery, a method to prevent them and its implementation in the Copenhagen Hospital Corporation (H:S) are described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The H:S adverse event database, the Danish Patient Insurance Association and international sources were searched to estimate the extent of wrong-site surgery. A method to prevent wrong-site surgery developed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs was adapted for Danish conditions. It was introduced as "The Five Steps" in H:S in May 2005, accompanied by an information campaign. RESULTS: Wrong-site surgery incidents are rare: reports in the H:S show an occurrence of 1:32,500 surgical procedures, consistent with international figures. Seven root cause analyses were performed and showed a need for a more structured identification and communication process among the members of the operating team. The Five Steps were designed to prevent such problems. None of the Five Steps is in itself new or revolutionary. The crucial parts are systematization of the identification process and increased communication among the members of the operating team. The procedure is not associated with substantial resource utilization and involves more a change in culture than an investment. The method can be widely implemented in hospitals in Denmark without major changes. CONCLUSION: Wrong-site surgery is a rare but serious adverse event. This paper describes the results of root cause analyses after reports of incidents in the H:S. The analyses showed a need for better and more structured communication and identification of patients before surgical intervention.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brian Bjørn, Louise Isager Rabøl, Elisabeth Brøgger Jensen, Beth Lilja Pedersen. 2006-11-27. [Wrong-site surgery: incidence and prevention].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17147945/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗