PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 17157403

Stabilization of interface-binding chloroperoxidase for interfacial biotransformation.

Ravindrabharathi Narayanan·Guangyu Zhu·Ping Wang
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The stability of an interface-binding chloroperoxidase (CPO) against the deactivation effect of H(2)O(2) was examined. Native CPO was conjugated with polystyrene and thus self-assembled at the water-oil interface. Although the interface-assembled CPO showed improved stability as compared to native CPO, enzyme deactivation as a result of the side effect of H(2)O(2), still limits the overall productivity of the enzyme. Two approaches to further improve the stability of CPO were examined in this work. In one approach, several stabilizers including poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), PEI, glycerol, sugars and sucrose monododecanoate were used; while in a second approach, in situ generation of hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) by using glucose oxidase (GOx) was applied. PEG was found exceptional in that it increased both the operational and storage stability of CPO. The best improvement of enzyme productivity was obtained with addition of PEG which led to an increase of 57% for interface-bound CPO and 33% for native CPO. One interesting observation with PEI is that it enhanced the storage stability against H(2)O(2) deactivation, but did not affect the enzyme's operational stability. On the other hand, glucose enhanced the operational stability by two folds, but exhibited no significant effect on storage stability. It was also found that the extended operational lifetime of CPO with in situ generation of H(2)O(2) by GOx was a result that combines the stabilizing effect of glucose and lowered concentration of H(2)O(2). Interestingly, the addition of stabilizers could improve the enantioselectivity of CPO by as much as 10%.

Explore related subjects

BiotransformationCatalysisChloride PeroxidaseEnzyme ActivationEnzyme StabilityEpoxy CompoundsHydrogen PeroxideOxidation-ReductionPolyethylene GlycolsPolystyrenesSurface-Active AgentsJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ravindrabharathi Narayanan, Guangyu Zhu, Ping Wang. 2006-12-08. Stabilization of interface-binding chloroperoxidase for interfacial biotransformation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.08.017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Divergent PXR function in seals: Endocrine adaptation or functional loss?

Seals accumulate xenobiotics through dietary biomagnification and exposure to polluted marine environments, with contaminants concentrating in their blubber. Biotransformation mitigates xenobiotic toxicity by converting lipophilic compounds into excretable hydrophilic metabolites, a process coordinated by nuclear receptors including the Pregnane X Receptor (PXR), whose plastic ligand-binding domain enables broad xenobiotic sensing. By examining PXR in pinnipeds, we investigated the evolutionary conservation and functional characterization of PXR using genomic sequence analysis, protein structural prediction, and transactivation assays, revealing broadly conserved structural features alongside species-specific functional divergence in receptor responsiveness to environmental stressors. Specifically, the obtained results highlight divergent gene and functional landscapes with ORF-disrupting mutations identified in Monachus monachus and Neomonachus schauinslandi that abolish receptor activation toward known PXR ligands. In contrast, Leptonychotes weddelli retained an intact PXR ORF but showed reduced receptor activity, revealing functional divergence in PXR among pinnipeds.

Biotransformation↗
PubMed2007

Biotransformation of raspberry ketone and zingerone by cultured cells of Phytolacca americana.

The biotransformation of raspberry ketone and zingerone were individually investigated using cultured cells of Phytolacca americana. In addition to (2S)-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanol (2%), (2S)-4-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-butanol (5%), 4-[4-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)phenyl]-2-butanone (19%), 4-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]phenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (23%), and (2S)-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)but-2-yl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (20%), two biotransformation products, i.e., 2-hydroxy-4-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]phenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (12%) and 2-hydroxy-5-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]phenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (11%), were isolated from suspension cells after incubation with raspberry ketone for three days. On the other hand, two compounds, i.e., (2S)-4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)but-2-yl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (17%) and (2S)-2-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)-4-[4-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)-3-methoxyphenyl]butane (16%), together with (2S)-4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-butanol (15%), 4-[4-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)-3-methoxyphenyl]-2-butanone (21%), and 4-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]-2-methoxyphenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (24%) were obtained upon addition of zingerone. Cultured cells of P. americana can reduce, and regioselectively hydroxylate and glucosylate, these food ingredients to their beta-glycosides.

Biotransformation↗
PubMed2007

Metabolism and bioactivation of 3-methylindole by human liver microsomes.

Metabolism and bioactivation of 3-methylindole (3MI) were investigated in human liver microsomes. The metabolism of two deuterium-labeled analogues of 3MI permitted a relatively unambiguous identification of multiple metabolites and glutathione (GSH) adducts of reactive intermediates. A total of eight oxidized metabolites were detected, five of which were assigned as previously identified 3-methyloxindole, 3-hydroxy-3-methylindolenine, 3-hydroxy-3-methyloxindole, 5-hydroxy-3-methylindole, and 6-hydroxy-3-methylindole. Among the three new metabolites, one was either 4- or 7-OH-3-methylindole, and the other two were derived from additional oxidation on the phenyl ring of 3-methyloxindole. When GSH was added to the microsomal incubations, seven conjugates that had molecular ions corresponding to the incorporation of GSH and an atom of oxygen at m/z 453 (group I) were produced, and two additional conjugates had molecular ions at m/z 437 that corresponded to the incorporation of GSH with no additional oxygen (group II). Two conjugates in group I (m/z 453) were apparently derived by GSH addition to the 5,6-epoxide metabolite of 3-methyloxindole. These two GSH adducts were tentatively identified as 5-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methyloxindole and 6-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methyloxindole. The most abundant conjugate in group I was identified as 3-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methyloxindole, which substantiated the presence of the putative 2,3-epoxy-3-methylindole intermediate. The remaining four adducts in group I were likely formed by conjugation of GSH at different positions of the phenyl ring, possibly via oxidation of 5-hydroxy-3-methylindole and 6-hydroxy-3-methylindole to two very interesting new electrophilic benzoquinone imine intermediates. For the group II conjugates (m/z 437), two isomers were identified as 2-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methylindole and 3-(glutathione-S-yl-methyl)-indole. The former adduct was primarily derived from the 2,3-epoxide intermediate by thiol conjugation followed by dehydration. The latter adduct was consistent with our previously published work on the dehydrogenation of 3MI. In those studies, we showed that the reactive intermediate, 3-methylenenindolenine, was formed by hydrogen abstraction at the methyl group and was trapped with GSH. The putative dehydrogenation bioactivation mechanism is also substantiated by the finding that CYP2E1 selectively generated 2-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methylindole but did not produce 3-(glutathione-S-yl-methyl)-indole. In summary, the results not only confirmed the formation of 2,3-epoxide-3-methylindole in human liver microsomes but also suggested that the phenolic metabolites of 3-methylindole were dehydrogenated to previously uncharacterized reactive intermediates.

Biotransformation↗