PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17163288

Treating chronic constipation : How should we interpret the recommendations?

Abstract

Chronic constipation is a multisymptom gastrointestinal motility disorder that negatively impacts the lives of those affected. New recommendations on diagnosing and treating this condition have recently been published. This review aims to assist clinicians in applying these recommendations in clinical practice. Although lifestyle interventions and bulking agents help some patients with constipation, data are lacking to support their efficacy in those with chronic constipation. If empirical treatment of patients with chronic constipation fails, osmotic laxatives (e.g. lactulose and polyethylene glycol), a serotonin (5-HT4) receptor agonist (e.g. tegaserod) or a chloride channel activator (e.g. lubiprostone) can be considered. Osmotic laxatives, though effective at increasing stool frequency, are often associated with adverse effects such as bloating and diarrhoea and typically do not effectively relieve the multiple symptoms of chronic constipation. Use of tegaserod and the recently approved lubiprostone is supported by high-quality evidence, and these agents have acceptable safety profiles in patients with chronic constipation. Recent advances in the definition of chronic constipation and in its pharmacological management have led to refinements in identifying the appropriate treatment needs of patients with this condition. It is hoped that these advancements will help clinicians select effective medical regimens for patients with chronic constipation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David A Johnson. 2006. Treating chronic constipation : How should we interpret the recommendations?. https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200626100-00001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗