PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17167372

Survey comparing clinicians' wound healing knowledge and practice.

Abstract

A cross-sectional design in the form of a self-administered postal questionnaire was sent to 238 staff of a general hospital to compare wound healing knowledge and practice. Seventy-four questionnaires were returned (response rate = 31.09%). No significant statistical differences were identified between the groups. Wound care practices demonstrated a lack of evidence-based care along with the continued use of outdated and hazardous practices. Knowledge was primarily sourced from colleagues and personal experience, with journals and courses favoured by the specialized clinicians. The clinicians rated pre-graduate training as inadequate. Medical staff dominated decision-making in specialized groups, while the responsibility was shared between the nurse and the tissue viability nurse in non-specialized areas. The clinicians identified clinical effectiveness and availability as influencing their dressing choices.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Janine Ashton, Patricia Price. Survey comparing clinicians' wound healing knowledge and practice.. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2006.15.sup4.22114

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗