PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 17171326

[Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy].

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Excision of damaged meniscal tissue whereby the mechanical obstacles to joint movement are eliminated. As much functional, intact meniscal tissue should be retained as possible. Resection of only the bare minimum. INDICATIONS: Symptomatic, irreparable lesions of the meniscus due to trauma or degeneration. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Reparable lesions of the meniscus. Local skin affections. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Introduction of the arthroscope through an anterolateral or central portal. The instrument portal is positioned in accordance with the situation of the meniscal lesion to be treated. The tissue to be excised is either broken into fragments with different punches or resected en bloc. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Functional postoperative management without immobilization. Full loading on the leg. RESULTS: Very good and good clinical results can be achieved in the short and long term after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. In a study by Burks et al., 88% of 146 patients with stable knee joints had a very good or good result 14.7 years after partial meniscectomy. 95% of 57 patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result 12 years after partial medial meniscectomy. A degenerative meniscal tear, axial deformity, higher age, and anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency are factors associated with an increased rate of arthrosis in the long term.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Johannes Zeichen, Stefan Hankemeier, Karsten Knobloch, Michael Jagodzinski. 2006. [Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-006-1184-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗