PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 17198116

A systems approach to purchasing and implementing new technology.

Kristin Kinney
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

There are many risks associated with purchasing and implementing new technology. The challenge is to reduce these risks to gain maximum benefit from the new technology purchased. In the high-cost world of healthcare, there is little room for wasting time and money related to technology implementation. If the workflow of the current system is not adequately understood before purchasing and implementing a new technology, that technology may mask underlying problems and/or create new ones. The purpose of this article is to present a framework for analyzing the current process or system, identifying the strengths and the areas in need of improvement. A thorough understanding of the problems with the current system and the barriers to change is necessary to ensure the selection of the "right" technology and promote its implementation.

Explore related subjects

Choice BehaviorEfficiency, OrganizationalHospital Information SystemsHumansNeeds AssessmentNurse AdministratorsNurse's RoleOrganizational InnovationOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePurchasing, HospitalSystems AnalysisTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalTotal Quality ManagementJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kristin Kinney. A systems approach to purchasing and implementing new technology.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006216-200701000-00009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

A compensation election for binary social choice.

We report experimental results examining the properties of a bidding mechanism, the "Compensation Election," which is designed to implement a simple binary choice between two options. We may think of the group decision problem as a choice between a new rule and the status quo. The rule and the status quo are each common outcomes that apply across all individuals, but the value or cost that they induce on each individual differs according to each individual's circumstances: some gain, some lose, and others are unaffected by a change to the new from the old. Rather than casting votes, each subject submits a bid reflecting his willingness to pay to induce the group to select one option and the amount he wishes to be paid if the alternative option is selected. The Compensation Election chooses the option that receives the highest sum of bids. We find that, although the Compensation Election allows subjects to strategically bid above their value (or even for the option they do not prefer), such behavior is not the norm. We also find that subjects' bids more truthfully reveal their values when there are more bidders in the election.

Choice Behavior↗
PubMed2007

The effects of expanding patient choice of provider on waiting times: evidence from a policy experiment.

Long waiting times for inpatient treatment in the UK National Health Service have been a source of popular and political concern, and therefore a target for policy initiatives. In the London Patient Choice Project, patients at risk of breaching inpatient waiting time targets were offered the choice of an alternative hospital with a guaranteed shorter wait. This paper develops a simple theoretical model of the effect of greater patient choice on waiting times. It then uses a difference in difference econometric methodology to estimate the impact of the London choice project on ophthalmology waiting times. In line with the model predictions, the project led to shorter average waiting times in the London region and a convergence in waiting times amongst London hospitals.

Choice Behavior↗