PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 17204991

Electromyographic findings after different selective neck dissections.

Tetsuya Tsuji·Akira Tanuma·Tetsuro Onitsuka·Mitsuru Ebihara·Yoshiyuki Iida·Akio Kimura·Meigen Liu
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to compare electrophysiologic investigations of the upper trapezius muscle (UT) after different selective neck dissections (SND) and analyze the differences between types of SND and the preservation and excision of the cervical nerves (the C2-4 rami of the cervical plexus). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of 54 patients (average age, 65.1 +/- 9.6 yr, 45 males) with 70 SND. METHODS: Patients underwent needle electromyography (EMG) of the UT by 4 months after surgery. The findings were rated according to the 5 point EMG scale system from 1 (total denervation: positive sharp wave or fibrillation potential at rest and electrical silence at voluntary contraction) to 5 (normal pattern). RESULTS: The average EMG scale was 1.7 +/- 1.1, 58.6% for score 1 and only 5.7% for score 5. There was not a significant difference in the EMG scale between the types of SND, whereas the group in which the cervical nerves were excised was significantly lower than in that in which it was preserved. The average EMG scales in the former and latter were 1.5 +/- 0.8 and 2.0 +/- 1.3, 68.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The study data confirm that complete or incomplete denervation of the UT was caused by axonal injury of the spinal accessory nerve, even though it was spared, because of traction of the nerve during neck dissection. Second, the excision of the C2 to 4 rami of the cervical plexus caused worse damage of the UT. It is suggested that it is important to preserve the cervical nerves to avoid denervation of the UT.

Explore related subjects

Accessory NerveAccessory Nerve InjuriesAction PotentialsAgedAxonsCervical PlexusElectromyographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle DenervationMuscle, SkeletalNeckNeck DissectionComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tetsuya Tsuji, Akira Tanuma, Tetsuro Onitsuka, Mitsuru Ebihara, Yoshiyuki Iida, Akio Kimura, Meigen Liu. 2007. Electromyographic findings after different selective neck dissections.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000249781.20989.5c

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

[High duplication of an internal jugular vein].

The internal jugular vein is an important landmark in most cervical operations. The surgeon should know the exact position and possible variations to prevent complications. We report on a duplicated internal jugular vein, which is a rare anatomic anomaly and discuss aetiology and appearance of this malformation and the possible affecting of the accessory nerve.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2007

Re-examination of the medullary rootlets of the accessory and vagus nerves.

The vagus (X) and cranial root of the accessory nerve (crXI) are traditionally described as arising from a series of rootlets from the medulla oblongata. Descriptions of the number of rootlets vary, and the existence of the crXI is contested. Here we report the results of dissections in six embalmed adult human specimens (11 sides). The rootlets forming the vagus were counted at three positions. At emergence from the brainstem there were between 12 and 21 rootlets, at the jugular foramen the range was 12-17, and midway between these two points it was 6-12. In addition, the origin of the most caudal X rootlet (cX) and the most rostral XI rootlet (rXI) was recorded in relation to the spino-medullary junction, defined as the caudal border of the olivary eminence. The position of the cX varied between -1 and +8 mm (median = +2 mm on left, +3.75 mm on right). The rXI varied between -5 and +7 mm (median = -0.5 mm on left, +1.75 mm on right). In five sides, rXI was above the caudal border of the olivary eminence and as such can be defined as being of cranial origin. These observations show the arrangement of rootlets contributing to the vagus to be more complex than what was described previously and provide evidence for the variable existence of a cranial root of the accessory nerve.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed2007

Posterior approach technique for accessory-suprascapular nerve transfer: a cadaveric study of the anatomical landmarks and number of myelinated axons.

Accessory-suprascapular nerve transfer by the anterior supraclavicular approach technique was suggested to ensure transferrance of the spinal accessory nerve to healthy recipients. However, a double crush lesion of the suprascapular nerve might not be sufficiently demonstrated. In that case, accessory-suprascapular nerve transfer by the posterior approach would probably solve the problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical landmarks and histomorphometry of the spinal accessory and suprascapular nerve in the posterior approach. Dissection of fresh cadaveric shoulder in a prone position identified the spinal accessory and suprascapular nerve by the trapezius muscle splitting technique. After that, nerves were taken for histomorphometric evaluation. The spinal accessory nerve was located approximately halfway between the spinous process and conoid tubercle. The average distance from the conoid tubercle to the suprascapular nerve (medial edge of the suprascapular notch) is 3.3 cm. The mean number of myelinated axons of the spinal accessory and suprascapular nerve was 1,603 and 6,004 axons, respectively. The results of this study supported the brachial plexus reconstructive surgeons, who carry out accessory-suprascapular nerve transfer by using the posterior approach technique. This technique is an alternative for patients who have severe crushed injury of the shoulder or suspected double crush lesion of the suprascapular nerve.

Accessory Nerve↗