PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 17205570

Flow cytometry PRA using lymphocyte pools from random donors.

Dong Il Won·Hee Du Jung·Ok-Ju Jung·Seung Huh·Jang Soo Suh
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pools of lymphocytes from carefully chosen donors have been used for flow cytometry (FC) panel reactive antibody (PRA) assays. We intended to devise an FC PRA assay using mixed lymphocyte pools from a large number of randomly selected donors (RD FC PRA) to accurately predict the likelihood of a positive HLA crossmatch. METHODS: Lymphocyte pools were prepared from randomly selected donors (N = 120). %PRA was calculated based on the anti-IgG FITC histogram of the T cells. The proposed RD FC PRA assay was assessed in comparison with the bead FC PRA, antiglobulin-augmented CDC (AHG-CDC) PRA assay, and the expected %PRA calculated by summing up the antigen frequencies of the known specificities. RESULTS: In 29 FC crossmatch positive sera, the positivity rate for the bead FC, RD FC, and AHG-CDC PRA was 100, 100, and 79%, and the mean %PRA was 77% +/- 0.205). In 19 sensitized patients with a negative FC crossmatch, the positivity rate was 21% using the RD FC PRA and 16% using the bead FC PRA, which suggested that both assays had similar abilities to detect low levels of HLA antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: The RD FC PRA assay allows easy panel preparation, reduces cost, and naturally reflects the probabilities of a positive crossmatch in the population to which the cadaveric donor belongs. Therefore, this new assay is expected to be useful as another approach to determine the % PRA.

Explore related subjects

Antigens, SurfaceDonor SelectionFlow CytometryGraft RejectionHLA AntigensHistocompatibility TestingHumansImmunoassayKidney TransplantationLymphocytesMalePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsComparative StudyEvaluation StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dong Il Won, Hee Du Jung, Ok-Ju Jung, Seung Huh, Jang Soo Suh. 2007. Flow cytometry PRA using lymphocyte pools from random donors.. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.20175

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Influence of 4- and 6-color flow cytometers and acquisition/analysis softwares on the determination of lymphocyte subsets in HIV infection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lymphocyte immunophenotyping provides valuable information for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with cellular immunodeficiencies, such as HIV/AIDS. In this study, we have assessed the influence of 4-color and 6-color flow cytometers, and respective analytical softwares on the enumeration of lymphocytes in HIV infected individuals. METHODS: The expression of various cell surface markers on lymphocytes was measured from the EDTA blood of 66 HIV infected patients on the FACSCalibur (4-color) and FACSCanto (6-color) flow cytometers. Percentage of lymphocytes expressing a particular cell surface marker was analyzed on FACSCalibur using the Cell Quest Pro software (v 5.2), while the analysis on FACSCanto was done using FACSCanto (v 1.0.3) and FACSDiva (v 4.1) softwares respectively. RESULTS: The data shows significantly higher mean CD3 T-cell counts on FACSCalibur, Cell Quest Pro (1,864 +/- 1,044 cells/microl) as compared to FACSCanto (1,840 +/- 1,040 cells/microl) (P < 0.05). The CD4 T-cell counts were also higher on FACSCalibur, Cell Quest Pro (885 +/- 770 cells/microl), and FACSDiva (892 +/- 773 cells/microl) versus FACSCanto (867 +/- 767 cells/microl) (P < 0.05). FACSCalibur, Cell Quest Pro, and FACSDiva showed similar values except for CD8 T-lymphocytes where FACSDiva had significantly lower values (P < 0.05). The B-cell counts were unaffected when either of the instruments or softwares were used, while the natural killer (NK) cells (CD16 + 56 positive cells) showed similar trend like CD3 and CD4 counts with significant differences in the mean cell counts between FACSCalibur, Cell Quest Pro (240 +/- 165 cells/microl), and FACSDiva (238 +/- 163 cells/microl) versus FACSCanto with higher NK cell counts (260 +/- 176 cells/microl). CONCLUSIONS: The enumeration of lymphocyte subsets was comparable between FACSCalibur, Cell Quest Pro, and FACSDiva, based analysis and it was significantly different than FACSCanto software based analysis. Our observations suggest that FACSDiva software should be preferred over the FACSCanto software for immunophenotyping on FACSCanto flow cytometer and the laboratories should report the instrument and software used for the specimen analysis while reporting immunophenotyping results.

Antigens, Surface↗
PubMed2006

Thalidomide destabilizes cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA by inhibiting p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and cytoplasmic shuttling of HuR.

We investigated the effect of thalidomide on transcriptional and post-transcriptional cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression, including a pathway leading to COX-2 mRNA destabilization. We found that thalidomide inhibited the interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta)-mediated induction of COX-2 protein and mRNA in Caco-2 cells. Transient transfection with a COX-2 promoter construct demonstrated that thalidomide did not affect IL-1beta-induced transcriptional activation of COX-2, although it did decrease the stability of COX-2 mRNA and suppress IL-1beta-induced cytoplasmic shuttling of an mRNA stabilizing protein, HuR. Thalidomide also suppressed IL-1beta-induced p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation, while a p38 MAPK inhibitor destabilized COX-2 mRNA and the cytoplasmic shuttling of HuR induced by IL-1beta. These data suggest that one of the molecular mechanisms of thalidomide may be destabilization of COX-2 mRNA through inhibition of cytoplasmic shuttling of HuR and p38 MAPK.

Antigens, Surface↗
PubMed2006

Increased frequency of CD4+ cells expressing CD161 in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Although the function of natural killer receptors on T cells infiltrating tumors and their potential effect on antitumor immunity has been investigated, little is known about T cells expressing NKR-P1A (CD161) in cancer patients. In the present study, we examined T cells expressing CD161 in the peripheral blood, the tumor tissue and in malignant effusions of patients with several types of malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression of CD161 in CD4(+) or CD8(+) (lacking CD56) T cells isolated from peripheral blood (n = 61), tumor specimens (n = 8), and malignant effusions (n = 37) of cancer patients was examined using four-color flow cytometry. Proliferative capacity and cytokine production of purified CD4(+)CD161(+)CD56(-) cells were studied after weak or strong stimulation, with or without costimulation, in the presence or absence of interleukin 2. The possible regulatory function of activated CD4(+)CD161(+)CD56(-) cells on T-cell alloresponses was also investigated. RESULTS: CD4(+) cells expressing CD161 were increased in cancer patients, compared with healthy individuals. This increase in the peripheral blood of cancer patients positively correlated with disease stage and was augmented at the tumor site. Phenotypic analysis revealed that CD4(+)CD161(+) cells are memory T cells, with low expression of activation markers. CD4(+)CD161(+) cells play an immunoregulatory role through cytokine production, because upon receiving costimulatory signals via CD28, they exert suppressive activity on autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cell alloresponses. CONCLUSIONS: CD4(+)CD161(+)CD56(-) cells represent a distinct memory T-cell population significantly increased in cancer patients. Depending on the type of signals provided by the tumor microenvironment, CD4(+)CD161(+) cells may regulate the immune response.

Antigens, Surface↗