PubMed · 1722085
[Intraprostatic prostheses].
Abstract
We evaluated the usefulness of the intraprostatic spiral prosthesis as an alternative to surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (40 cases), cancer of the prostate (7 cases), and cervico-prostatic sclerosis (2 cases). These 49 prostheses were placed in elderly patients (mean age 79 years) who had a long indwelling urethral catheter (mean 6.2 months) and were at high risk for surgery (ASA IV 83.6%). In 17% of the cases, placement of the prosthesis permitted performing curative surgery subsequently, once patient general condition had improved. Overall, good results were achieved in 63% (53 patients with BPH) of the cases who tolerated the long indwelling prosthesis well (mean 22 months). The results were assessed according to the quality of micturition (normal in 74.3%), correct placement of the stent (80%), no post-micturition residual volume (88.5%), and a flow rate of 6-12 ml/sec. (60%). Poor results (9 cases) owing to migration of the stent (7 cases) and/or complications: perforation of urethra (1 case), secondary stricture (1 case) and partial calcification of the prosthesis (1 case). The advantages and disadvantages of other currently utilized stents (Prostakath, Variospire, Wall-Stent, and Double Pezzer) are discussed.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Vicente Rodríguez, J Salvador-Bayarri, F Izquierdo de la Torre. 1991. [Intraprostatic prostheses].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1722085/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.