PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 17229241

GI Epidemiology: databases for epidemiological studies.

J A Davila·H B El-Serag
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large databases are being increasingly used for examining the epidemiology and outcomes of digestive and liver disorders. The complexity and rigor of the methods used to conduct these studies are often underestimated. AIMS: For the most commonly used databases, we provide a brief description of the contents, highlight strengths and weakness, and provide links for more detailed information. We also present a systematic approach to utilizing large databases for addressing research questions, highlighting commonly encountered study design issues, as well as strategies for resolving these issues. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Research using large databases requires the same essential skills needed to conduct research studies using other data sources. These include a rigorous study design, expertise in analytic methods, and relevant research questions. 2. The completeness and accuracy of information contained in the database must be assessed. Methods for improving the quality and completeness of this information should be considered. 3. Despite similarities among large databases, gaining insight and experience into the structure and content of each database is essential. Key points *Large databases can be a powerful source of information to examine the clinical epidemiology and outcomes of digestive and liver disorders. * Research using large databases requires the same essential skills needed to conduct research studies using other data sources. These include a rigorous study design, expertise in analytic methods, and relevant research questions. * The completeness and accuracy of information contained in the database must be assessed. Methods for improving the quality and completeness of this information should be considered. * Despite similarities among large databases, gaining insight and experience into the structure and content of each database is essential. * Examples of commonly used large databases are presented with a synopsis of information contained in the database, as well as strengths and limitations of using the database for research.

Explore related subjects

Databases as TopicDigestive System DiseasesEpidemiologic StudiesHumansJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Davila, H B El-Serag. 2007-01-15. GI Epidemiology: databases for epidemiological studies.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03207.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Italian Rett database and biobank.

Rett syndrome is the second most common cause of severe mental retardation in females, with an incidence of approximately 1 out of 10,000 live female births. In addition to the classic form, a number of Rett variants have been described. MECP2 gene mutations are responsible for about 90% of classic cases and for a lower percentage of variant cases. Recently, CDKL5 mutations have been identified in the early onset seizures variant and other atypical Rett patients. While the high percentage of MECP2 mutations in classic patients supports the hypothesis of a single disease gene, the low frequency of mutated variant cases suggests genetic heterogeneity. Since 1998, we have performed clinical evaluation and molecular analysis of a large number of Italian Rett patients. The Italian Rett Syndrome (RTT) database has been developed to share data and samples of our RTT collection with the scientific community (http://www.biobank.unisi.it). This is the first RTT database that has been connected with a biobank. It allows the user to immediately visualize the list of available RTT samples and, using the "Search by" tool, to rapidly select those with specific clinical and molecular features. By contacting bank curators, users can request the samples of interest for their studies. This database encourages collaboration projects with clinicians and researchers from around the world and provides important resources that will help to better define the pathogenic mechanisms underlying Rett syndrome.

Databases as Topic↗
PubMed2007

A database on treating drug addiction with traditional Chinese medicine.

AIMS: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used to treat drug addiction for more than 160 years and valuable experiences have been accumulated with regard to patients' detoxification and rehabilitation. The aims of this project were (1) to establish a computerized, bilingual (Chinese-English) database on TCM for drug addiction; (2) to analyse the literature published in this field; and (3) to identify those Chinese herbs commonly used for drug addiction treatment. DESIGN: (1) Paper collection: related papers were collected through electronic databases and hand-searched materials; (2) data computerization: the Microsoft Access program and Delphi language were used as the major data management systems; (3) paper analysis: annual publications from 1989 to 2003 were classified and calculated; and (4) herbal analysis: the frequency of herbs used and herbal function categories were analysed. FINDINGS: (1) A special bilingual database that contained 340 works of professional literature, including 85 patent files on TCM for drug addiction, was established, in which more than 90% of the publications originated from mainland China; (2) the literature classification showed a significant increase in the number of publications on clinical and laboratory researches in this field over the past decade; (3) five functional categorizations of Chinese herbs and the 10 most frequently used Chinese herbs as well as three toxic herbs were identified from more than 200 herbs reported in 150 original research articles and 85 patent files. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, the published data on TCM in the treatment of drug addiction were analysed systematically by using a new database. The results are invaluable for further laboratory and clinical studies to obtain more direct evidence.

Databases as Topic↗
PubMed2006

Surgical revision of loop ("mini") gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: The claim that the "mini"-gastric bypass (MGB) procedure with its loop gastrojejunostomy is safer and equally effective to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure has been promoted before validation. Rumors of unreported complications and the accuracy of follow-up are additional concerns. This study was undertaken to identify MGB patients who require or required revisional surgery at 5 hospitals within the region of the United States where the MGB procedure originated to assess the claim that revision to RYGB is rarely needed. METHODS: The databases of 5 medical centers were retrospectively searched to identify patients undergoing surgical revision after a MGB procedure, all of which had been done elsewhere. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were identified who presented with complications after undergoing an MGB procedure and required or require revisional surgery. The complications included gastrojejunostomy leak in 3, bile reflux in 20, intractable marginal ulcer in 5, malabsorption/malnutrition in 8, and weight gain in 2. Of the 32 patients, 21 required conversion to RYGB and an additional 5 have planned revisions in the future. Also, 2 patients were treated with Braun enteroenterostomies and 4 required 1 or more abdominal explorations. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this preliminary review have confirmed that MGB does require revision in some patients and that conversion to RYGB is a common form of revision. A national registry to record the complications and number of revisions is proposed to gain insight into the need for revision after MGB and other nontraditional bariatric procedures.

Databases as Topic↗