PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1726557

Practitioner's guide to industrial back problems.

Abstract

If return to work is part of the expected outcome, more and more data indicate that medical care alone does not hold the key to providing success. Our modern physical treatments may seem a humane alternative to no treatment, but they have not been proven to significantly alter the natural course of back problems. Even the results of strongly indicated surgical treatment differ little from doing nothing at all after a 4-year period. From the physical standpoint, activation has the best track record for recovery and can be simply provided in a manner that can be used lifelong. The real key to return to work goes beyond the physical treatment by addressing the predicament of what the patient will do until age 65. This humane approach to care has evolved from common frustrations of dealing with patients with back problems, observations in the third world, and information gained from scientific studies. Medical pain, and physical models alone are unsuccessful. To be humane and successful, we can no longer ignore the nonphysical factors that can, and do, influence patients' responses to physical treatment, especially when return to work is part of the expected outcome.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S J Bigos, M T Andary. 1991. Practitioner's guide to industrial back problems.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1726557/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Radiofrequency denervation for neck and back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration back review group.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain disorders. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a lack of effective treatment for chronic zygapophysial joint pain and discogenic pain. Radiofrequency denervation appears to be an emerging technology, with substantial variation in its use. METHODS: Original articles for this review were identified by electronically searching MEDLINE, PsycLIT, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to February 2002, hand-screening references, and consulting experts in the field. Two reviewers selected the randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the main results and methodologic quality of the selected trials. Finally, qualitative analysis was conducted to evaluate the level of scientific evidence. RESULTS: Of seven relevant randomized controlled trials, six were considered to be high quality. The selected trials included 275 randomized patients, 141 of whom received active treatment. One study examined cervical zygapophysial joint pain; two, cervicobrachial pain; three, lumbar zygapophysial joint pain; and one, discogenic low back pain. The sample sizes were small, follow-up times short, and there were deficiencies noted in patient selection, outcome assessments, and statistical analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence that radiofrequency denervation offers short-term relief for chronic neck pain of zygapophysial joint origin and for chronic cervicobrachial pain, and conflicting evidence for its effectiveness for lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. There is limited evidence suggesting that intradiscal radiofrequency may not be effective in relieving discogenic low back pain. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed, with larger patient samples and data on long-term effects, for which current evidence is inconclusive.

Back Pain↗