PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1736318

Cadaver imaging proves valuable learning method.

Abstract

In evaluating the project as a whole, students expressed feeling greater worthwhileness through participation in a special project. They enjoyed working as a team with faculty in an imaging environment and reported having fun and learning simultaneously. Also, students felt a sense of accomplishment in contributing to medical students' learning by participating in this service experience. This helped reinforce their role in health care and the need for cooperative relationships in medical education and practice. Based on student and faculty perceptions, this learning method is considered a valuable alternative to traditional means of performance practice and clinical education. The project's success is the result of: Its organization to meet the needs of both the service commitment and a learning environment. The motivational nature of a special voluntary experience alternative. The highly interactive and dynamic nature of the imaging sessions. The realistic feedback for performance with opportunity for analysis and improvement. While it is evident that a cadaver resource must exist to make such a project a viable option for radiography programs, those with such a resource should consider integrating it with the more traditional learning methods. Many program sponsors may have similar resources available in their environments for projects that provide imaging services as well as unique learning laboratories for radiography students. Close interaction with health educators and researchers along with creative investigation may reveal opportunities for special projects.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N L Lavin, R Lam. Cadaver imaging proves valuable learning method.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1736318/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Utilization and evaluation of living-related donors for patients with adult polycystic kidney disease.

Adult onset polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) causes 10% of all end-stage renal disease in the United States. Use of living-related donors for renal transplants provides significant advantages over cadaver donors. Presymptomatic testing to determine ADPKD status of potential donors by DNA linkage analysis is potentially more accurate than renal ultrasonography for related donors < 30 years old. To determine the utilization of living donor transplants and linkage studies, a survey was mailed to 202 transplant centers in the United Network of Organ Sharing. The 111 respondents reported 5,026 renal transplants done in 1988 of which 390 (7.8%) involved an ADPKD recipient. Only 7% of these 390 transplants utilized a living-related donor compared to the 20% rate reported for all renal transplants. DNA linkage studies were not used by any of the centers performing related donor transplants in 1988 and only 29% reported provision of risk counseling. We conclude that living-related transplants are underutilized for ADPKD recipients due to conservative transplant policies, concern about the inaccuracy of presymptomatic diagnosis, or decreased availability of asymptomatic donors in these families. DNA linkage analysis is also underutilized due to lack of knowledge of its availability and accuracy, concerns about its cost and misconceptions about the accuracy of ultrasonography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cadaver