PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1740526

Notes on necropsy.

Abstract

From the above it can be seen that autopsy is not a grotesque, macabre procedure performed for peculiar and disreputable reasons in a remote corner of the hospital. On the contrary, it is a scientific study designed to forward our knowledge of health and disease by the three primary methods of service, teaching and research. The examination of a dead body is always an emotional procedure. The pathologist and those concerned with frequent performance of autopsies become accustomed to it. To witness an autopsy may cause considerable emotional reaction in inexperienced people. As part of the learning experience, it can be very useful and appropriate staff are welcome to attend by arrangement. As proper protection garments are required and the suitability of viewing certain autopsies may arise, a formal request to the responsible pathologist is necessary. Whatever one's religious beliefs, it may be helpful to think of the deceased person's body as something which he or she has used during life, but which is no longer in any real way the persons once life has departed. The decreased body must be treated with dignity and respect as representing the remains of what was a human being and because of the natural desire of the next of kin that the remains of their relative should so be treated; it is not the person who used the body during life.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H E Emson. 1992. Notes on necropsy.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.45.1.85

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Sudden, unexplained infant death--sudden infant death syndrome. Forensic pathological aspects].

Delimitation of the sudden unexplained infant death syndrome (SIDS) is difficult as the diagnosis is made by exclusion. The difficulties in the differential diagnosis are concentrated on interpretation of the significance of positive viral and bacterial findings, inflammatory changes in the respiratory organs, heart and central nervous system together with malformations. Classification of SIDS appears, therefore, to vary according to time and place. New techniques, e.g. DNA analysis, have explained the etiology in a few per cent of the cases but have not yet solved the riddle of SIDS. The article reviews hypotheses about apnoea, arrhythmia, overheating and inefficient surveillance of the infant. It is emphasized that assessment of risk factors for SIDS requires valid epidemiological investigations where the basis for the diagnosis is a uniform classification of SIDS infants as compared with other groups of sudden death in infancy. An investigation of this nature has been initiated in the Nordic countries. It is important to examine and treat infants with abnormal sleep apnoea but generalized employment of monitoring has not reduced the number of unexplained infantile deaths.

Autopsy

[Reliability of bronchial tumor typing base on fibroscopically obtained biopsies].

This study is based on the bronchial tumors biopsied and later examined between 1971 and 1986 at the Institute of Pathology, Lausanne. In each case the diagnosis based on the initial biopsy material is compared with the final surgical or autopsy diagnosis (Reference: Histological typing of lung tumours, second edition, WHO, 1981, 2). The series studied is constituted by 163 cases: 144 men (88.3%) and 19 women (11.7%). In 136 cases (83.4%), the biopsy diagnoses are identical to the diagnoses based upon surgical or autopsy material; in 27 cases (16.6%) these diagnoses differ. The positive predictive value of bronchial biopsy appears to be excellent (100%) for small cell and epidermoid carcinoma (CA). It is satisfactory for adenocarcinoma (85.7%) but insufficient for large cell CA (42.3%) and the tumors grouped under "others" (50%). The diagnosis of large cell CA, in situ CA, papillary tumor, undifferentiated CA, or carcinomatous lymphangitis should be considered with caution and in some cases it is advisable to repeat the biopsy. The discrepancies between the initial and final diagnoses can, in all cases, be attributed either to the biopsy specimen being too small and therefore nonrepresentative or, less frequently, to crushing and necrosis of the tissues.

Autopsy