PubMed · 1774679
Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study.
Abstract
Articulators that program eccentric condylar pathways minimize occlusal adjustments of dental prostheses. This bench study compared three groups of methods for recording the immediate Bennett shift and the protrusive condylar path of the mandible. The experimental design restricted the variable associated with these methods. The various methods for recording protrusive excursions from best to worst were: (1) electronic pantography (Denar); (2) mechanical pantography (Denar); and (3) simplified mandibular motion analyzers (Whip-Mix and Denar). The methods of recording immediate side shift from best to worst were: (1) electronic pantograph; (2) polyether interocclusal records; (3) mechanical pantography (Denar) and simplified mandibular motion analyzer (Panadent); (4) simplified mandibular motion analyzer (Whip-Mix and Denar); and (5) zinc oxide interocclusal records.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L B Pelletier, S D Campbell. 1991. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80047-2
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.