PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1775750

[Implantable hearing aids].

Abstract

The purpose of these hearing aids is to improve the quantity and quality of amplification of the sound wave. Their operating principle is based on the existence of a transducer which transforms the electric signal captured by the microphone into a mechanical, vibrating wave. This transducer can act either directly on the temporal bone by short-circuiting the middle ear (and is then called a bone conduction implant) or directly on the ossicular chain (in which case it is called an ossicular transduction implant). A) There are 2 types of bone conduction implant: the "Audiant Bone Conduction" system of Hough-Vernon (Xomed), where an outside electromagnetic coil sends signals transcutaneously to a magnetic screw embedded on the temporal bone. Bone conduction must be normal. The "Bone Anchored Hearing Aid" (Nobelpharma) where the outside electromagnetic coil sends signals directly to the magnetic screw that is percutaneous. The mean thresholds in bone conduction can reach up to 45 dB. The drawbacks of this system lie in its inaesthetic appearance and the risk of infection. B) With ossicular transduction implants, the transducer may be: either an electromagnetic coil influencing a magnet fixed to the tympanum, on the ossicular chain, or replacing an element of the ossicular chain (these hearing aids are marketed by Richards); or a piezo-electric crystal which produces vibrations when it is subjected to an AC current, and which can be positioned on the stapes (Yanagihara). This system consumes less energy, gives excellent results for the high frequencies, but is more cumbersome.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Gersdorff, N Deggouj. 1991. [Implantable hearing aids].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1775750/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Canal atresia: "surgery or implantable hearing devices? The expert's question is revisited".

OBJECTIVES: (1) Evaluate hearing results in patients managed with external auditory canal reconstruction; (2) compare results to the expectations from treatment with surgical; placement of an osteo-integrated bone-conduction device (BAHA system); (3) assess complications of both interventions; (4) evaluate the medical cost-effectiveness of each avenue of management at 2005 rates for billings based upon relative value units (RVUs). METHODS: (1) Retrospective chart review for 36 ears in 29 pediatric patients who underwent surgical canal reconstruction at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital in a major urban center with assessment of management techniques and surgical and audiologic outcomes. (2) Retrospective chart review of six pediatric patients who underwent BAHA placement in a major urban center with assessment of management techniques and surgical and audiologic outcomes. (3) Cost reassessment at 2005 billings rates based upon RVUs for canal reconstruction versus BAHA system and comparative analysis. RESULTS: (1) The average post-operative hearing loss in the right ear was 34.3 dB left ear was 31.6 dB. The average gain per ear was 17.3 dB. (2) Twenty-seven (93%) of EAC reconstruction patients required some form of amplification post-operatively. (3) Data available for three of the BAHA patients reflected the predicted average gain in dB (predicted 34.3 dB, observed 31.8 dB). (4) Early complications of canal reconstruction included removal of the packing by the patient, post-operative bleeding and post-operative hematoma. (5) Late complications included recurrent canal stenosis, recurrent otitis externa, canal prolapse and canal cholesteatoma. (6) Uncomplicated external auditory canal reconstruction cost $51,505.98 or $2909.94/dB of hearing gain based upon billings fro RVUs. (7) Uncomplicated two-staged BAHA system placement cost $42,448.85 or $1237.57/dB of hearing gain based upon billings for RVUs. (8) Uncomplicated single-staged BAHA system placement cost $28,341.00 or $826.27/dB of hearing gain based upon billings for RVUs. CONCLUSIONS: Study results indicate that even with significant investments in EAC reconstruction, most patients still required some form of amplification. There are also significant risks of early and late complications from the reconstructive procedure. Studies indicate and our results support that the osteo-integrated bone-conduction device (BAHA system) can achieve truly acceptable hearing (<or=15 dB) in school-aged children with normal bone curves, and it can match the bone-curves for children with sensorineural hearing loss. The two-staged BAHA system placement may be provided at almost one-third the cost to the medical system, on a decibel-for-decibel basis. The single-stage BAHA system placement yields even greater cost savings at just over one-quarter of the cost of surgical EAC reconstruction on a decibel-for-decibel basis. Additionally, there are fewer complications and fewer follow-up visits for the care of the implant system. This is an added value to the parents and patient for the savings in opportunity costs related to the lost time at work and school for office visits and peri-operative care. Overall, it appears that osteo-integrated bone-conduction devices may provide a higher quality of outcome for patients while resulting in significant economic savings.

Bone Conduction↗

A finite element model of the human head for auditory bone conduction simulation.

In order to investigate the mechanisms of bone conduction, a finite element model of the human head was developed. The most important steps of the modelling process are described. The model was excited by means of percutaneously applied forces in order to get a deeper insight into the way the parts of the peripheral hearing organ and the surrounding tissue vibrate. The analysis is done based on the division of the bone conduction mechanisms into components. The frequency-dependent patterns of vibration of the components are analyzed. Furthermore, the model allows for the calculation of the contribution of each component to the overall bone-conducted sound. The components interact in a complicated way, which strongly depends on the nature of the excitation and the spatial region to which it is applied.

Bone Conduction↗