PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1775847

Estrogens and infection.

Abstract

The multiple effects of estrogens on infectious processes are only beginning to be understood. The existence of such effects is suggested by gender-related differences in the incidence and severity of some infections and by the association of certain infections with predictable hormonal changes. Current information indicates that estrogens may depress cell-mediated immunity, impair the activity of natural killer cells, and suppress some aspects of neutrophil function. Estrogens potentiate the production of systemic antibody, but local antibody responses may be impaired. Direct effects of estrogens on microorganisms have thus far been best studied in fungi; these hormones may either stimulate or suppress fungal virulence, depending on the species involved. Recent research also suggests responsiveness to estrogens in a wider variety of microorganisms. Studies in cell culture, animals, and humans indicate that pregnancy, estrogen supplementation, and menstrual stage can affect the acquisition and severity of certain bacterial, parasitic, and viral infections. This interaction depends on multiple attributes of both the microbe and the host in a given setting and thus may lead to disparate outcomes; however, there appears to be a predisposition to increased infectious morbidity in certain high-estrogen states. In view of the widespread use of estrogen supplementation, the clinical impact of estrogens on the incidence and outcome of infection needs to be better defined.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Styrt, B Sugarman. Estrogens and infection.. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids%2F13.6.1139

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Analysis of HLA class I specific antibodies in patients with failed allografts.

BACKGROUND: The goals of this study are first to determine the epitope specificity of donor specific antibody (DSA) in the serum of alloimmunized transplant patients with a failed renal graft; and second to understand the correlation between the development of DSA and nondonor specific antibody (NDSA). METHODS: The sera of 35 pretransplant panel reactive antibody (PRA)-negative patients with failed allografts were examined with single-antigen (SA) luminex beads to identify human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A and -B antibodies. Potential HLA antibody epitopes were identified by using computer software and verified by absorption and elution from single-antigen cell lines. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients developed donor-specific HLA-A and/or -B antibodies, while the remaining eight patients had only nondonor-specific HLA-A and/or -B antibodies. The DSA-positive patients also had a long list of NDSA. Sixty-eight percent of the reactions found in 27 recipients with DSA were attributable to 66 epitopes on the mismatched donor HLA molecule. All 39 NDSA in eight patients with only NDSA shared 17 epitopes within positive allele specificities. By absorption and elution using recombinant cell lines having a single HLA specificity, we confirmed the epitopes involved in three patients. CONCLUSION: Development of most NDSA in patients with failed allografts is likely due to sharing epitopes with DSA and/or other NDSA.

Antibody Formation↗

Human keratinocyte Toll-like receptors promote distinct immune responses.

It has been well established that Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are expressed by keratinocytes and respond to their respective ligands to initiate immune responses. However, it appears that keratinocytes, via differential activation of TLRs, may play a key role in determining the type of subsequent cutaneous immune response generated against a particular pathogen.

Antibody Formation↗