PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1781522

Low-flow anaesthesia. Practice, cost implications and acceptability.

Abstract

An 8-week survey was conducted to determine whether the introduction of low-flow anaesthesia (a fresh gas flow of 4 litres/minute or less) into routine use would be acceptable to members of a representative anaesthetic department and if the consequent reduction in use of volatile anaesthetics would result in financial savings. The hourly consumption of the volatile agents was measured during anaesthesia conducted using either conventional or low fresh gas flows. Anaesthetists' acceptance of low-flow anaesthesia was assessed using a questionnaire. Data were gathered on 286 patients undergoing inhalational anaesthesia for routine operative procedures. A 54.7% reduction in the consumption of isoflurane and a 55.9% reduction in that of enflurane was found. Of the 28 anaesthetists at the hospital, 21 would use low-flow anaesthesia routinely. The routine use of low-flow anaesthesia would therefore be acceptable and could result in annual savings of 26,870 pounds at Northwick Park Hospital.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S M Cotter, A J Petros, C J Doré, N D Barber, D C White. 1991. Low-flow anaesthesia. Practice, cost implications and acceptability.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09910.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Aqueous solubilization of highly fluorinated molecules by semifluorinated surfactants.

The physical and chemical properties of organic compounds are deeply affected by the introduction of fluorinated substituents. Perfluorinated and highly fluorinated organic molecules are both hydrophobic and lipophobic. This makes the recognition and the binding of fluorinated molecules extremely difficult to achieve through classical elements of molecular recognition. Here we show that semifluorinated water-soluble block copolymers can generate micellar structures having a fluorous phase-based inner core in aqueous solution. Furthermore, we show that these micelles can be used to encapsulate and bind highly fluorinated molecules through association in the internal fluorous phase (fluorophobic effect). We report that semifluorinated block copolymers can be used for the aqueous solubilization of the widely diffused gaseous anesthetic sevoflurane, thereby suggesting the possibility of the intravenous delivery of this commonly used anesthetic.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗

Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.

BACKGROUND: The LMA-ProSeal is a new laryngeal mask airway with a rear cuff and drainage tube that allows a higher seal pressure than the LMA-Classic for the same intra-cuff pressure, and it permits drainage of gastric secretions and access to the alimentary tract. The LMA-ProSeal can be used in children but it does not have a rear cuff. This study compared the LMA-ProSeal and the LMA-Classic in children for ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure and fibre-optic visualization. METHODS: Sixty ASA I-II children undergoing herniorrhaphy, orchiopexy or myringotomy were included. The patients were randomly assigned to size 2 LMA-Classic trade mark or size 2 LMA-ProSeal groups for airway management. We assessed success rates at first attempt of insertion, airway sealing pressure, fibre-optic position, success rates of gastric tube placement and postoperative blood staining of the device, tongue-lip-dental trauma and hoarseness. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the two groups for the success rates at first attempt of insertion, airway sealing pressure and fibre-optic position. Gastric tube insertion was successful in 90% of cases in the LMA-ProSeal group. The LMA-Classic had a higher rate of postoperative blood staining, but there was no tongue-lip-dental trauma or hoarseness in either group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ease of insertion and airway sealing pressure are similar between the LMA-ProSeal and the LMA-Classic in children.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗

Comparison of manufacturers' specifications for 44 types of heat and moisture exchanging filters.

BACKGROUND: Although heat and moisture exchanging filters (HMEF) are recommended for use during anaesthesia, the criteria for choosing a filter are not clearly defined. Manufacturers offer many different types of HMEF with various technical characteristics. We compared the technical specifications provided by the manufacturers for different types of HMEF. METHODS: Filter manufacturers were asked to provide technical information. Additional information was obtained from websites. Information about 44 filters (16 mechanical and 28 electrostatic) was collated. RESULTS: Filter performances were estimated with different sizes of microorganism and durations of challenge. Twenty-eight filters had not been tested by independent laboratories. For 12 of the filters, information obtained from websites and from the manufacturers differed. Most filter specifications claimed high efficiency, particularly for filtration, microbial challenge number and test duration. Electrostatic filters used in anaesthesia were claimed to have high filtration efficiency, similar to the efficiency provided by mechanical filters. Excluding moisture output values did not alter the general conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Technical aspects of the tests, international standards, and independent validation should be considered when a filter is chosen.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗