PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1792434

[Lung transplantation].

Abstract

Lung transplantation began to expand in 1983, after the advent of cyclosporin and the publication of the Toronto lung transplant group study. Single lung transplantation was first performed in patients with interstitial pneumopathy to be extended later to pulmonary emphysema, then to primary or secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension. Double lung transplantation provides patients suffering from chronic lung infection (e.g. cystic fibrosis) with a useful alternative to their ordinary treatment. The experience acquired throughout these years has resulted in wider criteria for patients' inclusion. More than acute rejection, bacterial infections directly condition the immediate prognosis. The frequency and severity of cytomegalovirus lung diseases lead to a discussion on the possibility of prophylactic and curative antiviral therapy. The occurrence of obliterative broncholitis, which reflects chronic lung rejection, jeopardizes the long-term results of transplantation. The functional results of the various types of lung grafting are analysed, and the position of lung transplantation in thoracic surgery is reassessed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Caubarrère, M Stern, P Bonnette, A Bisson. [Lung transplantation].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0248-8663(05)83191-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hypoimmune platforms: from rejection to immune evasion and regulatory implications.

The growing gap between organ demand and clinical availability has renewed interest in immune-evasive graft strategies, yet rejection and lifelong immunosuppression remain major barriers to durable success. Advances in genome editing enable immune-evasive cell platforms designed to avoid immune recognition while replacing missing function in allogeneic settings. This review summarizes current strategies for engineering immune-evasive grafts that simultaneously suppress adaptive and innate immune responses. We discuss how coordinated modulation of antigen presentation and immune checkpoint pathways can protect transplanted allogeneic cells and tissues from T, NK, and macrophage-mediated rejection. We also present the emerging concept of integrating hypoimmune engineering with genetically modified porcine donors, where extensive genome editing has reduced, but not eliminated, xenogeneic immune barriers. Combining donor genome modification with immune-evasive graft design represents a promising conceptual advance toward xenograft survival, though whether full elimination of systemic immunosuppression is achievable remains to be established clinically. We further examine how the regulatory landscape for these products is evolving across major jurisdictions, and how differences in approval pathways, manufacturing standards, and long-term surveillance requirements shape the path to clinical translation. Finally, we outline the safety considerations and remaining limitations in immune evasion that must be addressed to enable clinical implementation.

Graft Rejection↗

The classification and treatment of antibody-mediated renal allograft injury: where do we stand?

Since the acceptance of the detection of C4d in allografts as a reliable tool to mark a humoral alloresponse, de novo antibody-induced graft injury has attracted much attention. Antibodies and B cells are the new frontier in transplantation. At this juncture carefully designed studies are critical in order to gain solid diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic knowledge about the role of antibodies in graft injury and to avoid any confusion and misconception. One prerequisite is the strict adherence to refined classification systems of renal transplant rejection that carefully split and categorize different phenotypes of humoral mediated graft damage and ideally also include information on anti-donor antibody specificity and titers. Sun and colleagues follow this concept and provide evidence that mixed cellular and antibody-mediated graft rejection can respond favorably to intensified immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. What will the future bring to treat rejection episodes with a dominant, co-dominant, or minor antibody response?

Graft Rejection↗