PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 179387

Lesion conspicuity, structured noise, and film reader error.

H L Kundel·G Revesz
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The concept of conspicuity is introduced in an attempt to objectively quantitate radiographic observational error. Defined as a ratio between lesion contrast and surround complexity, the measure correlates well with the probability of detecting faint nodular lesions in chest radiographs. The concept helps in understanding why abnormalities are missed by radiologists. It is also used to explain why image-processing techniques advocated in the past did not yield improvements in diagnostic accuracy and to outline directions for the future. Preliminary results are presented which show that photographic subtraction can increase the conspicuity of simulated early lung lesions and improve their detection.

Explore related subjects

Absorptiometry, PhotonAngiographyContrast MediaDiagnostic ErrorsHumansLung NeoplasmsProbabilityRadiographic Image EnhancementTechnology, RadiologicJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H L Kundel, G Revesz. 1976. Lesion conspicuity, structured noise, and film reader error.. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.126.6.1233

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Time related bias in longitudinal studies using dual photon absorptiometry.

Examining the bone mineral density (BMD's) slope of patients regularly followed in our department, we observed recently that the group of patients who had their last BMD during the last 6 months of 1989, had a different slope than patients who had their last BMD during the following 6 months. In order to investigate if a small time-related bias of measurement, unsuspected by the former quality control investigations, could exist, we performed the following analyses. A regression equation between BMD and time was calculated and a slope was obtained for 95 women who had been followed for at least 3 yr and had had at least 3 BMD measurements during that time. The women were divided in 3 groups according to when the last BMD measurement had been performed (July-December 1989, January-June 1990 or July-December 1990). The slopes of the 3 groups of patients were compared. For each value of BMD of every patient, a predicted BMD (BMDp) was calculated using the regression equation and the relative difference (RD) between BMDp and BMD was calculated and analysed in relation to time. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the slopes of patients in relation to the time when the last BMD had been measured. Significant fluctuations (p < 0.001) in RD were observed in relation to time. These RD variations suggested the existence of a time-related error. The presence of this error is also substantiated by the fact that a parallelism existed between the curve of the RD variations and the curve of the mean values of BMD of all patients referred to our department, calculated per period of 4 months. Although the fluctuation of the latter curve was not statistically significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1992

Lumbar bone mineral content measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in newborns and infants.

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), a non-invasive method for measuring small amounts of mineral, was used to assess the bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (5 vertebrae) in 57 newborns (on day 1-2) and 22 infants (1-24 months of age). A modified high-resolution program (Hologic) allowed us to assess BMC and BMD with a precision higher than 2.4% and 1.5%, respectively. In newborns, BMC and BMD correlated positively with birth weight, body area, length and gestational age: r = 0.73, 0.71, 0.63 and 0.60, respectively, for BMC; and r = 0.59, 0.58, 0.54 and 0.53, respectively, for BMD. In infants, both BMC and BMD were highly correlated with weight, age, length and body area over two years (r = 0.94 or better in each instance). The data provide normal values for lumbar spine BMC and BMD in newborns (gestational age 31-40) and infants up to two years of age; DXA appears to be an excellent and safe tool for pediatric bone mineral measurements.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1992

Comparison of the effect of different reference data on Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.

We have investigated whether the Lunar DPX (software 3.4) and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers have comparable normal reference databases for the spine and femur of white UK and USA subjects. After conversion for systematic differences in absolute bone density values between the two systems, the reference databases were very similar for the spine in young subjects, but there were clear differences in the femur databases of young females and males of all ages. These differences were confirmed by comparing the percent age-matched and young values determined by the two systems for subjects scanned on both systems. Thus the diagnosis and management of a patient could differ, depending on the system used for the bone density measurements.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗