PubMed · 1843600
[Discrepancy between clinical depression and psychometric depression].
Abstract
Convergencies and discordances among three different strategies for the psychometric evaluation of depressively (self-report inventories, objective or external questionnaires, and verbal content analysis) are discussed. Twenty-one inpatients with a major depressive disorder, and 21 inpatients with a non-endogenous depression were assessed with different instruments. While an external assessment of depressiveness coincided with both clinical and diagnostical criteria, depressiveness as assessed with self-report inventories, and verbal content showed lesser scores among patients with endogenous depression (n-21): Such patients assessed themselves as "less depressive" than patients with dysthymic disorder (n-21), even when admitted at a mental hospital. Results suggest that any assessment--as far as endogenous depression is concerned--should be basically performed by means of external evaluation questionnaires.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Heerlein, P Richter. 1991. [Discrepancy between clinical depression and psychometric depression].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1843600/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.