PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1856505

The challenge for future debate on euthanasia.

Abstract

There is a significant pattern emerging in the discourse about euthanasia and assisted suicide as exemplified in the other articles in this special issue of the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. That pattern is a dynamic tension that should be nurtured in the best interests of our options at the end of life. On the one hand, there is general acceptance of the right to self-determination and (within debatable limits) of the rationality and mortality of suicide. And on the other hand, there has been emphasis on comfort care through appropriately chosen medications and through a wholesome doctor-patient relationship that fosters a view of life worth living. Thus the creative tension is between the freedom to be dispatched with a minimum of suffering and the efforts to make it more desirable to stay and fight. It is a variation of the "fight or flight" response. The tension must be maintained for the good of us all. Too much emphasis on either one would skew the balance, and a dangerous extreme could result.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K D Clouser. 1991. The challenge for future debate on euthanasia.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-3924(91)90054-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[A separation of public health ethics from medical ethics].

Until now there are only a few approaches in the German-speaking realm to establish an explicit ethical framework for moral issues of public health--although a need for public health ethics in times of SARS and avian flu is obvious. One deficit of the discussion so far is that there is no systematic separation of medical ethics and public health ethics. Thus, the core and interdisciplinary focus of public health is often not met. However, to frame discussions of moral issues within a specific public health ethics framework seems to be fruitful. This paper deals with the conceptual differences of medical ethics and public health ethics. The discussion helps both applied ethical discourses to sharpen their focus and strengthen their appeal. The author develops and presents a conceptual and normative frame for public health ethics and offers a concise set of ethical principles for the discussion of moral challenges in public health.

Ethics, Medical↗