PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1864419

[Immediate decontamination. Comparative ergonomic study].

Abstract

The standard procedures of decontamination between two patients were studied. As standards were chosen the OSHA's standards (Organization for Safety and Health Administration). The study was conducted by means of a "time and motion" analysis. The most important conclusions reached were: 1) it's impossible to complete the whole sequence in less than 10-15 minutes; 2) within this period one assistant didn't have any time to help the doctor at the chair; 3) consequently the doctor has to work alone for 10-15 minutes, unless a second assistant had been employed; 4) consequently, when we try to improve the decontamination, we need another assistant to make the work smoother, with a rise of the costs; 5) the systematic usage of the so called "barriers" is extremely time-wasting; 6) the only way to reduce the decontamination-time is the use of automatic devices, as the "Autosteril".

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Guastamacchia. 1991-05-15. [Immediate decontamination. Comparative ergonomic study].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1864419/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[The use of molecular epidemiologic markers in the study of an epidemic outbreak of legionnaires' disease of nosocomial origin].

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological investigations of Legionella infections are based, since recently, on molecular techniques that are more sensitive and specific than phenotypic traits. We were interested in these methods for subtyping isolates of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 and confirm the epidemic spread of an outbreak of legionnaires' disease at the Universitary Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP) in Badalona. METHODS: Environmental samples taken from domestic water, heating and cooling water systems and oxygen humidifiers were examined. Clinical and environmental isolates of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 were compared by analysis of genomic DNA by restriction endonucleases. RESULTS: We could found L. pneumophila serogroup 1 and 9 in domestic hot water and heating systems and L. micdadei in cooling water system. Cleavage of genomic DNA showed that all restriction fragment patterns coming from clinical and environmental isolates of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 were identical and different from isolates belonging to the same species and serogroup but coming from community area. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular analysis of clinical and environmental isolates of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 has allowed to identify a reservoir related to a nosocomial outbreak of legionnaires' disease at the HUGTiP, and a clonal population of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 in environmental samples genotypically identical to the clinical ones.

Cross Infection