PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1866728

[Drugs in developing countries. Current status, problems and possible solutions].

Abstract

Based mainly on economic, administrative and drug logistics indicators, the article critically reviews the use of drugs in less developed countries in the context of the global drug scene. The lack of balance in less developed countries (LDCs) between indicators of need and determinants of political, economic, professional, educational and sociocultural nature, including product marketing efforts is highlighted. Special emphasis is given to the global WHO Action Programme on Essential Drugs, its background, strategies, implementation and tentative impacts. Country case examples from Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Kenya, Zimbabwe and the Gambia are used for illustration. Varying progress is made in about half the 110 LDCs which have formally adopted the WHO concepts. Delayed implementation, setbacks and failures are prevalent. These reflect financial and other resource constraints, political ambiguity, qualitative and quantitative deficiencies related to manpower and insufficient back-up measures of an educational and informative character. An orientation towards operational research based on competence-building according to needs and strategies is highly desirable. Accordingly a plea is made for multidisciplinary collaboration in North-South networks at university level.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M T Jallow, P K Lunde. 1991-06-20. [Drugs in developing countries. Current status, problems and possible solutions].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1866728/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Costs of surgeries in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Surgical care is essential for achieving global health equity, yet low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face major gaps in access and planning, partly due to limited evidence on the costs and resource requirements of surgical interventions. Understanding these costs is vital for designing efficient and equitable health systems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review (covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, EconLit and grey literature) to identify studies reporting the costs of surgeries in LMICs from January 2000 to June 2023. Minor and major surgical procedures were considered, focusing on therapeutic procedures (excluding diagnostic interventions). Studies that clearly identified, quantified and costed hospital resources and services deployed in the provision of surgical care, and included at least two of the surgical production factors (ie, consumables, diagnostics, personnel, infrastructure and overhead) in the costing were included. Costs were standardised to 2023 International dollars (I$) for comparability. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies from 29 countries met the inclusion criteria, with 210 cost estimates across 65 procedure groups. Costs varied widely: from I$1.54 for a caesarean section in Tanzania to I$618 098 for paediatric cataract surgery in Zambia. Full costing studies reported higher estimates than partial costing studies. Most studies (60%) originated from upper-middle-income countries, with limited data (10%) from low-income settings. CONCLUSION: This review provides a reference list of surgical procedure costs across LMICs, highlighting considerable cost variation by procedure, specialty and country. The findings underscore the need for better-quality, standardised cost data-especially from low-income countries-to inform national surgical plans, universal health coverage benefit packages and reimbursement policies.

Developing Countries