PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1882426

Monitoring and evaluation of relief programmes.

Abstract

Information is power. Every major relief programme of the past 15 years has shown that facts and figures are an indispensable tool for health staff. A simple graph of daily mortality rates can work miracles: mobilize human and material resources, focus the attention of decision-makers, guide and refine the assistance programme that is being put in place. If you want useful data, look at these five areas: (i) mortality; (ii) incidence of the most important diseases; (iii) nutritional status; (iv) 'activities data', such as immunizations performed; and (v) the 'vital sectors', namely food, water, sanitation, shelter, etc. The most effective way of presenting information is graphically, so that anyone can see at a glance the trend from month to month. Finally, there are two golden rules. Always give feedback to the workers out in the field who are the primary source of information. And secondly, always act upon information: if your statistics do not lead to concrete action, you are probably better off not collecting them at all.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P A Hakewill, A Moren. 1991. Monitoring and evaluation of relief programmes.. https://doi.org/10.1177/00494755910210s106

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cancer mortality in a synthetic spinning plant in Besançon, France.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the mortality of a cohort of workers in a synthetic textile spinning plant and to evaluate the relationship between mortality from lung, liver and bladder cancer and the processes or the products used. METHODS: The study population consisted of male workers present for at least 6 months in the plant from 1968 to 1984. The cohort was followed until 1999. Vital status and the causes of death were determined by consulting national registries. The population of the Franche-Comté region was used for comparison. In total, 17 groups of exposure were assessed by the industrial hygienist, based on the consensus of an expert group that determined the exposure levels of each job to selected occupational hazards. Each worker was assigned to one or several groups, according to his occupational history. Confounding factors could not be assessed. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR) and 95% bilateral confidence intervals were calculated based on an assumed Poisson distribution of the number of cases to compare the plant mortality and the population mortality. Internal analyses were performed with Cox models in order to assess the risks of death related to the various exposures. RESULTS: In the whole cohort, mortality from all malignant neoplasms was lower than expected, but this was not significant. All the estimated SMRs were lower than or close to 1. The "hot -line fitters" (RR = 2.13; n = 9; 1.06 to 4.29) and the "fibre-drawing workers" (RR = 1.83; n = 20;1.09 to 3.07) experienced a statistically significant excess in mortality from lung cancer. A slightly elevated but not significant risk of death related to lung cancer (RR = 1.5; n = 41; 0.8 to 2.7) was observed in the groups with the highest exposure to mineral fibres. A statistically significant increase in cancer deaths was observed for workers with high exposure to dust (higher intensity: RR = 1.42; n = 79; 1.06 to 1.89). CONCLUSION: Some findings, mainly of lung cancer, justify further exploration in other plants in this industry.

Epidemiologic Methods↗

Mortality in Iraq.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Epidemiologic Methods↗