PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1894204

Reflections on the casework relationship: beyond empiricism.

Abstract

This article examines the dynamics of the casework relationship from a holistic perspective. The significance of the interplay between caseworker and client often evades efforts at objective evaluation. Too often emphasis is placed on concrete indications of progress. Staff who look solely at these measures may become frustrated and lose sight of internal change not easily revealed in empirical studies. This article looks at how long-term casework relationships revolve around existential issues that lie at the heart of psychiatric rehabilitation. These relationships, however resistant to stringent measurement, enjoy value apart from specific achievements and merit recognition in their own right. The ordeal of change that both parties endure leaves them heir to a legacy of struggle and renewal.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Horowitz. 1991. Reflections on the casework relationship: beyond empiricism.. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw%2F16.3.170

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗