PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1895343

A fail-safe system for ophthalmic group practice.

Abstract

If a mistake is made by a staff member, the error is detected and corrected automatically by other staff members before the patient is affected. In employing the Fail-Safe System, all personnel must accept that mistakes are inevitable but can be kept to a minimum through staff cooperation. The two key points of the Fail-Safe System are the correct receipt and transmission of information and, once the information is received, the ability of the receiver to assess the correctness of the information. The five subsystems of the Fail-Safe System are the improvement of each employee's medical knowledge; the mastering of correct pronunciation; the mastering of correct writing; the maintenance of a constructive atmosphere in the hospital; and a trouble reporting and analysis process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Takayama, N Hagiwara, T Hara. A fail-safe system for ophthalmic group practice.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1895343/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Managing risk: risk perception, trust and control in a Primary Care Partnership.

In this article, managers' perceptions of risk on entering a newly formed primary health care partnership are explored, as are the mechanisms of trust and control used to manage them. The article reports a qualitative component of a 2-year National Health and Medical Research Council funded study of trust within the structures of a Primary Care Partnership (PCP) in Victoria, Australia. Multiple methods of data collection were employed. We found that managers identified risks at system, partnership and agency levels, and that as trust was built, concern about risks diminished. Trust effectively facilitated joint action, but it was betrayed on occasions, in which case the informal power of group process was used to contain the problems. The implications of this study for policy makers are in terms of understanding how perceptions of risk are constructed, the ways managers use social control to create a safer context in which to locate the trust-based relationships that facilitate joint action, and the importance of institutional arrangements. Without trust, joint action is hard to achieve, and without control, it is difficult to prevent breaches of trust from inhibiting joint action.

Group Practice↗