PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1922167

AAEM Minimonograph #10: volume conduction.

Abstract

A volume conductor is any medium with the capability of passively conducting a current between regions of potential difference. The monophasic positive intracellular action potential produces a monophasic negative extracellular waveform and a triphasic extracellular waveform in a poor and good volume conductor, respectively. The observed waveform characteristics are dependent upon both the recording electrode montage and the type of volume conductor surrounding the excitable tissue. The extracellular current flow associated with an action potential can be divided into two current sources flanking a central current sink. If a recording electrode is located over the negative current sink, a negative potential is observed. When the two current sources approach a recording electrode, a positive potential is recorded. If a positive deflection of the baseline is observed, one may conclude that the wave of depolarization under investigation did not originate under, but traveled toward, the recording location. Electric currents from external sources are free to propagate extraneurally as the body is a good volume conductor. Care must be taken to not activate nearby nerves and, subsequently, obtain a waveform contaminated with potentials from undesired sources. Additionally, electrical activity from neighboring muscles and nerves can summate in the volume conductor and yield responses capable of masking pathology. An understanding of the principles of volume conduction theory can help the electrodiagnostician avoid artifactual errors and erroneous conclusions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Dumitru, J A DeLisa. 1991. AAEM Minimonograph #10: volume conduction.. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880140704

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Conductance-controlled point functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes.

We used covalent attachments to single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) to fabricate single-molecule electronic devices. The technique does not rely on submicrometer lithography or precision mechanical manipulation, but instead uses circuit conductance to monitor and control covalent attachment to an electrically connected SWNT. Discrete changes in the circuit conductance revealed chemical processes happening in real time and allowed the SWNT sidewalls to be deterministically broken, reformed, and conjugated to target species. By controlling the chemistry through electronically controlled electrochemical potentials, we were able to achieve single chemical attachments. We routinely functionalized pristine, defect-free SWNTs at one, two, or more sites and demonstrated three-terminal devices in which a single attachment controls the electronic response.

Electric Conductivity↗

A model explaining genotypic and ontogenetic variation of leaf photosynthetic rate in rice (Oryza sativa) based on leaf nitrogen content and stomatal conductance.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: Identification of physiological traits associated with leaf photosynthetic rate (Pn) is important for improving potential productivity of rice (Oryza sativa). The objectives of this study were to develop a model which can explain genotypic variation and ontogenetic change of Pn in rice under optimal conditions as a function of leaf nitrogen content per unit area (N) and stomatal conductance (g(s)), and to quantify the effects of interaction between N and g(s) on the variation of Pn. METHODS: Pn, N and g(s) were measured at different developmental stages for the topmost fully expanded leaves in ten rice genotypes with diverse backgrounds grown in pots (2002) and in the field (2001 and 2002). A model of Pn that accounts for carboxylation and CO diffusion processes, and assumes that the ratio of internal conductance to g(s) is constant, was constructed, and its goodness of fit was examined. KEY RESULTS: Considerable genotypic differences in Pn were evident for rice throughout development in both the pot and field experiments. The genotypic variation of Pn was correlated with that of g(s) at a given stage, and the change of Pn with plant development was closely related to the change of N. The variation of g(s) among genotypes was independent of that of N. The model explained well the variation in Pn of the ten genotypes grown under different conditions at different developmental stages. Conclusions The response of Pn to increased N differs with g(s), and the increase in Pn of genotypes with low g(s) is smaller than that of genotypes with high g(s). Therefore, simultaneous improvements of these two traits are essential for an effective breeding of rice genotypes with increased Pn.

Electric Conductivity↗