PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1943937

Innovative bridging program for overseas trained doctors.

Abstract

Most overseas trained doctors wishing to practise in Australia are required to sit for examinations set by the Australian Medical Council (AMC) before they can seek registration through State medical boards. In 1989, the South Western Sydney Area Health Service, which is responsible for the delivery of health services to 650,000 people, initiated a bridging program with the joint aim of providing overseas trained doctors with the opportunity to undertake a comprehensive program of study and facilitating the recruitment of doctors into the area. The program comprises two integrated components, each extending over five months. Stage 1 relates to the AMC's multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) examination; stage 2 prepares candidates for the clinical examination. In addition, provision is made for developing awareness of professional responsibility, standards and ethical bases for the practice of medicine in Australia. Participants are also required to study English and communication skills throughout the program. Acceptance into the program is based on a number of criteria including successful completion of a screening test and an interview. Progression to the Clinical Course requires that candidates pass the MCQ Course and undertake to work in the area. The program has been funded jointly by State and Commonwealth Government bodies. Results obtained by program participants in the MCQ and clinical examinations conducted by the AMC have been well ahead of the national average.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I W Webster, R W Rawlinson. 1991-10-21. Innovative bridging program for overseas trained doctors.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1943937/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Whole genome characterisation of Australian and New Zealand OsHV-1 'μVar' like variants over time.

Ostreid herpesvirus 1 (OsHV-1) is a major pathogen of Pacific oysters (Magallana gigas), linked to mass mortality events worldwide and presents a substantial threat to global aquaculture. Since 2010, mortality events have been occurring in Pacific oysters within Australia with the cause being an OsHV-1 microvariant highly similar to OsHV-1 μVar first detected in France, 2008. In this study, fifteen OsHV-1 whole genomes were assembled from Australian and New Zealand mortality events, including twelve newly sequenced genomes and three assembled from public datasets. Whole-genome phylogenetic analyses indicate that Australian and New Zealand OsHV-1 isolates form a distinct clade, separate from European and East Asian genomes, and with moderate regional and temporal divergence across the past 14 years. Across the dataset, multiple biologically relevant mutations were observed in genes of known function, including DNA polymerase, ribonucleotide reductase subunits, and apoptosis-related proteins, though most mutations occurred in uncharacterised genes. These findings highlight the limitations of single-gene typing and support the need for whole-genome approaches in understanding OsHV-1 evolution. Critically, the lack of recent whole-genome data, particularly from East and Southeast Asia, restricts the ability to trace viral origins and detect novel variants, underscoring the need for expanded global OsHV-1 genomic surveillance.

Australia↗

Interest holder-driven research priorities in sexual and reproductive health for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritise sexual and reproductive health research priorities for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults in Australia using a priority setting partnership approach. METHODS: A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership was conducted with 92 interest holders: 31 youth from migrant and refugee backgrounds and 61 professionals (healthcare providers, researchers, policymakers and community leaders), recruited online and in-person. The priority setting partnership process included a rapid evidence scan, an online uncertainty survey, evidence verification, interim prioritisation and a final consensus workshop. RESULTS: Eighty-three research uncertainties yielded 11 final priorities across four sexual and reproductive health domains: sexual and reproductive health literacy, sexual violence prevention, accessible services and maternal health. A striking divergence emerged between youth and professional priorities only 3 achieved combined high-priority consensus. Youth prioritised a broader range of topics, including abortion access (rated high by youth but low by professionals), while professionals prioritised fewer areas. Two priorities achieved consensus: community-based maternal health support and barriers to reporting gender-based violence. CONCLUSION: This is the first priority setting partnership to identify sexual and reproductive health research priorities for migrant and refugee youth in Australia and to uniquely highlight substantial misalignment between youth and professional priorities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: These identified priorities provide a foundation for targeted research, culturally responsive policy and more equitable sexual and reproductive health service provision for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults.

Australia↗