PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1945340

Problems with substantial limb lengthening.

Abstract

Limb lengthening takes careful planning and meticulous outpatient care and still is burdened by minor complications. Experience may lessen major complications, but pin tract problems, swelling, and pain will plague these patients. A large group of patients can benefit from lengthening procedures, and new techniques are improving the risk-benefit balance. A thoughtful approach is needed by the surgeon, especially taking time to fully inform the patient about the time, effort, and problems involved in substantial limb lengthening.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Eldridge, D F Bell. 1991. Problems with substantial limb lengthening.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1945340/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Ultrasonographic monitoring of limb lengthening.

Limb lengthening in nine patients was monitored by radiographs and by ultrasound scans. The distraction gap appeared as a sonolucent area within which echogenic foci developed soon after distraction commenced. By seven weeks a new cortex was detected, and medullary canal began to develop between seven and eight weeks. Ultrasound scanning can be used to measure distraction, but it was not as useful as radiographs in detecting angulation. Its use in patients undergoing limb lengthening could reduce their exposure to radiation.

Bone Lengthening