PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2031976

Thalassemia: genotypes and phenotypes.

Abstract

The large degree of phenotypic heterogeneity of thalassemia can now be related to the underlying genomic defects. This information has accumulated rapidly over the last years through the recent advances in molecular technology. The list of main types of thalassemia (alpha or beta) that can be differentiated includes several gene deletions (complete or partial) and point mutations (or very short deletions). These occur within the genes or across the flanking DNA sequences and apparently interfere with the expression of these genes. From a quantitative point of view, the severity of the condition is directly related to the amount of functional globin chain mRNA which is made available to the ribosomes; this may vary from zero (gene deletions, frameshift, non-sense mutations or mutations at the splice-junction nucleotides) to very little (mostly hnRNA processing mutants) or to slightly subnormal (transcriptional mutants, mutations resulting in cryptic site activation or in defective cleavage of the poly-A tail). A few hyper-unstable globin chains also produce a thalassemic phenotype. This pattern is straightforward in the alpha-thalassemias. In the beta-thalassemias, the decreased beta-chain synthesis reflects the available mRNA, but the phenotypic expression depends also on the ability of the patient to reactivate gamma-chain synthesis and complement the red cell content with hemoglobin F.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Loukopoulos. 1991. Thalassemia: genotypes and phenotypes.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01702920

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data.

Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.

Genotype↗