PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2034825

[Conversation during regional anesthesia].

H J Hannich·I Gralow·C Magh
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

From the psychological point of view, regional anesthesia is something special because the patient experiences his operation consciously. This means that the anesthetist is required not only to guarantee a safe anesthetic, but also to recognize the special needs of the patients, to enter into them adequately, and thus to support the patient's own strategies for coping with his situation. The question arises as to what extent the anesthetist's behavior meets the patient's psychological requirements. For this reason, the conversation between patient and anesthetist was monitored during 17 operations under regional anesthesia and investigated by means of a quantitative speech analysis. It was shown that the anesthetist clearly predominated in the course of the conversation: particularly during the time when the patient was preparing himself for the operation, it was the anesthetist who actively framed the communication by numerous questions and conversational activities while the patient responsively remains passive. The anesthetist spoke simply and clearly to the patient. Prime consideration was given to explaining the anesthetic procedure and the operation. There were not many attempts by the physician to also deal with the patient's psychic state. On the while, communication was concerned with the quick and easy performance of anesthesia. This was also demonstrated by the fact that conversation between the anesthetist and the patient was nearly absent during the operation.

Explore related subjects

Anesthesia, ConductionCommunicationHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H J Hannich, I Gralow, C Magh. 1991. [Conversation during regional anesthesia].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2034825/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section.

BACKGROUND: Regional and general anaesthesia (GA) are commonly used for caesarean section (CS) and both have advantages and disadvantages. It is important to clarify what type of anaesthesia is more efficacious. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of regional anaesthesia (RA) with those of GA on the outcomes of CS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2005), and EMBASE (1980 to December 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of RA and GA in women who had CS for any indication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, data extraction and trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen studies (1586 women) were included in this review. Women who had either epidural anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia were found to have a significantly lower difference between pre and postoperative haematocrit (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 2.93, one trial, 231 women) and (WMD 3.10, 95% CI 1.73 to 4.47, one trial, 209 women). Compared to GA, women having either an epidural anaesthesia or spinal had a lower estimated maternal blood loss (WMD -126.98 millilitres, 95% CI -225.06 to -28.90, two trials, 256 women) and (WMD -84.79 millilitres, 95% CI -126.96 to -42.63, two trials, 279 women). More women preferred to have GA for subsequent procedures when compared with epidural (odds ratio (OR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.96, one trial, 223 women) or spinal (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.81, 221 women). The incidence of nausea was also less for this group of women compared with epidural (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.64 to 6.14, three trials, 286 women) or spinal (OR 23.22, 95% CI 8.69 to 62.03, 209 women). No significant difference was seen in terms of neonatal Apgar scores of six or less and of four or less at one and five minutes and need for neonatal resuscitation with oxygen. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from this review to show that RA is superior to GA in terms of major maternal or neonatal outcomes. Further research to evaluate neonatal morbidity and maternal outcomes, such as satisfaction with technique, will be useful.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed2006

[Perineal regional anaesthesia: indications in gynaecologic and proctologic surgery and in obstetric].

Perineal and proctologic surgery is well known as very painful. The apparition of new specific needles, long acting and less toxic local anaesthetics and neurostimulation allowed reconsidering some old forgotten techniques. Those blocks appear really useful to optimize multimodal postoperative analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation. After anatomic review, authors describe perineal regional anaesthesia and discuss about main indications and advantages, in the eyes of their experience and bibliographic review.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗