PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2037889

Population differences affect nonstress test reactivity.

Abstract

The nonstress test (NST) is the most widely used test of fetal well-being. Recently it has been suggested that race may play a role in NST reactivity. The objective of this research was to explore population variables in addition to race that may influence NST reactivity. Study subjects were 1263 black and 658 white women who underwent NST in the week preceding delivery at a tertiary facility. Retrospective analysis of data from a comprehensive database was conducted. It was found that the percentage of black women with a nonreactive NST was more than three times the percentage of white women, and that from 35 weeks' to 42 weeks' gestation there were significantly fewer reactive NSTs for blacks than for whites (P less than .05). Racial differences in NST results persisted in a logistic regression analysis controlling for several population variables including pregnancy complications and demographic and behavioral factors (odds ratio 3.81; 95% CI 3.03 to 4.78). Regression analysis also confirmed that gestational age, maternal education, epilepsy, and smoking significantly influenced NST reactivity. These results indicate that population differences in NST reactivity exist at our facility. Further prospective study of population determinants of NST reactivity is needed to determine how race, test indication, and other clinical, demographic, and behavioral variables should be used in interpretation of tests of fetal well-being. Standard criteria for NST testing may not be useful in all obstetrical populations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L L Paine, D M Strobino, F R Witter, T R Johnson. 1991. Population differences affect nonstress test reactivity.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2037889/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of prognostic factors and survival among black patients and white patients treated with irradiation for non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported differences in cancer incidence and survival between populations of Blacks and Whites. A 45% higher death rate from lung cancer for Black men and a survival duration for Black patients with lung cancer that is generally shorter than that for White patients have also been reported. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether race affects known prognostic factors for non-small-cell lung cancer in Black versus White patients. This analysis attempts to determine which prognostic factors may contribute to the reported differences in disease outcome. METHODS: We used data from 1565 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated in four randomized prospective trials conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The data were pooled for a retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors by race. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed significant differences between Blacks and Whites with regard to sex, weight loss, histology, and RTOG T stage (P < .05), but the only clinically significant difference (P < or = .01) was weight loss. Despite these findings, overall survival for Blacks and Whites did not differ significantly (P = .67). Median survival for Blacks and Whites with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 90 or more was 12.1 and 11.3 months, respectively (P = .45). Survival for Blacks and Whites with a KPS of less than 90 was 7.8 and 6.8 months, respectively. Cause of death did not differ between the two races. For both races, KPS, age, sex, weight loss, and RTOG T and N stages were significant prognostic factors for survival (P < .01), but race was not a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Further studies of the differential in cancer survival for Blacks and Whites may be indicated, but greater impact may be achieved by addressing socioeconomic factors, lifestyle and occupational risk factors, health education, and access to adequate health care.

Black People