PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2054818

Aortic valvuloplasty.

Abstract

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty is a palliative treatment for adult patients with aortic stenosis who are not candidates for AVR. BAV can be performed using a single balloon (one balloon, one shaft), multiple balloons (multiple balloons, multiple shafts), or complex balloon configurations (bifoil or trefoil balloons on a single shaft) by the retrograde (femoral or brachial) or antegrade (transseptal) approach. The mechanisms of successful BAV are fracture of calcified nodules, separation of fused commissures, and simple stretching of valve leaflets, leading to increased leaflet mobility and larger orifice dimensions. Clinically, these changes lead to a 50% to 70% decrease in transaortic valve gradient and a 50% to 70% increase in aortic valve area, resulting in immediate improvement in symptoms in most patients. Despite the fact that these beneficial hemodynamic results are achieved with a low incidence of life-threatening complications, the major limitation of BAV is the high incidence of restenosis. About 80% of patients have recurrent symptoms within 2 years of BAV, leading to death of the patient or requiring late AVR or repeat BAV. As a result of the high incidence of restenosis after BAV, elderly patients with aortic stenosis should not be denied the opportunity for AVR solely on the basis of age. BAV may have a role, however, in the following situations: (1) to treat patients in whom AVR is contraindicated for clinical or technical reasons; (2) to treat patients who require urgent noncardiac operations; (3) to clarify the extent of surgery required in patients with aortic stenosis, severe mitral regurgitation, and poor LV function; and (4) to predict the likelihood of successful outcome after AVR in patients with aortic stenosis, low gradients, low cardiac output, and poor LV function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R D Safian, R E Kuntz, A D Berman. 1991. Aortic valvuloplasty.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2054818/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Transvalvular Flow Rate is Associated With Mortality Rate and Lifetime Loss in Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.

Low-flow states are associated with adverse outcomes in aortic stenosis (AS), but the prognostic value of transvalvular flow rate (TFR) has not been consistently established across studies. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies (published by November 14, 2025) comparing low versus normal TFR in AS. Data were collected from Kaplan-Meier curves. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Survival was assessed using pooled Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression, flexible parametric survival models, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis. A total of 9 studies including 6,494 patients were analyzed; 2,575 (39.7%) had low TFR. At 8 years of follow-up, estimated survival was 34.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.7% to 47%) in the low-TFR group and 63% (95% CI 58.9% to 67.4%) in the normal-TFR group. Low TFR was associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.59, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.74, p < 0.001). We observed a progressively greater hazard over time, with the hazard ratio approaching 1.9 by 8 years. At 8 years, RMST in the normal-TFR group was 7.37 years (95% CI 7.21 to 7.53 years) versus 5.07 years (95% CI 4.91 to 5.23 years) in the low-TFR group, representing a lifetime loss of 2.3 years in the low-TFR group (&#x394;RMST -2.30 years, 95% CI -2.53 to -2.07 years, p < 0.001). In patients with AS, low TFR is associated with significantly higher mortality and lifetime loss. These findings support TFR as a clinically meaningful marker for risk stratification in AS.

Aortic Valve Stenosis↗

Implantation of the CoreValve percutaneous aortic valve.

Surgical aortic valve replacement is the only recommended treatment for significant aortic valve stenosis. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement appears to be a novel option for high-risk patients. We report the implantation of the ReValving system (CoreValve, Paris, France) in a 64-year-old woman who was refused aortic valve replacement surgery for critical aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction because of severe pulmonary fibrosis. After anesthesia, the patient was put on femorofemoral cardiopulmonary bypass, and underwent a balloon valvuloplasty with subsequent retrograde aortic valve replacement by the ReValving system. Transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring of the patient's hemodynamics showed immediate improvements of the valvular area and left ventricular ejection fraction and only traces of paravalvular leaks. The patient was easily weaned from ventilation and resumed activity soon after the surgery. A multidisciplinary approach is presently necessary to offer a reliable and safe procedure.

Aortic Valve Stenosis↗