PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2057308

Time estimation and attentional perspective.

Abstract

The purpose of the present experiment was to investigate whether the filled interval effect is influenced by different attentional perspectives of the same event. Musically sophisticated listeners were asked to compare the duration of paired melodies that varied both in lower order contour changes and the relative timing of higher order phrase periodicities. Results indicated that a given pair of melodies could produce over- or underestimations, depending on which hierarchical level of structure was selectively tracked. These findings are discussed in terms of a framework that links event coherence and dynamic attending modes to time-estimation activities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Boltz. 1991. Time estimation and attentional perspective.. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03212176

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading.

Mechanisms of human attention allow selective processing of just the relevant events among the many stimuli bombarding our senses. Most laboratory studies examine attention within just a single sense, but in the real world many important events are specified multimodally, as in verbal communication. Speech comprises visual lip movements as well as sounds, and lip-reading contributes to speech perception, even for listeners with good hearing, by a process of audiovisual integration. Such examples raise the problem of how we coordinate our spatial attention across the sensory modalities, to select sights and sounds from a common source for further processing. Here we show that this problem is alleviated by allowing some cross-modal matching before attentional selection is completed. Cross-modal matching can lead to an illusion, whereby sounds are mislocated at their apparent visual source; this crossmodal illusion can enhance selective spatial attention to speech sounds.

Attention

Neurobehavioral profiles of children with neurofibromatosis 1 referred for learning disabilities are sex-specific.

We compared neurobehavioral profiles of 10 children with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF-1) referred for evaluation of learning disabilities (NF/LD) to those to learning disabled children without known genetic disease (LD), matched for age, sex, and estimated IQ. It was hypothesized that the NF/LD children would exhibit a neurobehavioral profile diagnostic of compromise of frontal/subcortical brain systems while those of the case controls would be heterogeneous. Records from a clinical data base were reviewed retrospectively for the neurological and neuropsychological components of an interdisciplinary learning disabilities evaluation. Neurological abnormalities were more frequent in the NF/LD group, involving gross and fine motor coordination, praxis, and megencephaly. As predicted, clinical neuropsychological diagnostic ratings and composite neurobehavioral observation scores were consistent with compromise of frontal systems in the NF/LD group. An unanticipated finding was that outcomes in the NF/LD group were sex dependent: Megencephaly was observed in females only; and the frontal/subcortical neurobehavioral profile was more consistently observed in females. Females with NF-1 with megencephaly may be at increased risk for a neurobehavioral syndrome contributing to LD that is consistent with compromise of frontal/subcortical brain systems.

Attention

Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

How should a visual search task be terminated when no target is found? Such searches could end after a serial search through all items, but blank trials in many tasks are terminated too quickly for that to be plausible. This paper proposes a solution based on Wolfe's (1994) Guided Search model. The probability that each item is a target is computed in parallel based on items' differences from each other and their similarity to the desired target. This probability is expressed as an activation. Activations are examined in decreasing order until the target is found or until an activation threshold is reached. This threshold is set adaptively by the observer--more conservative following misses, more liberal following successful trials. In addition, observers guess on some trials. The probability of a guess increases as trial duration increases. The model successfully explains blank trial performance. Specific predictions are tested by experiments.

Attention