PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2100466

[Material study for Aumatic foil technique].

A Fiedler
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The disadvantage of conventional metal ceramic restorations seems to be the loss of transluszenz and transparency in thin ceramic layers, on behalf of Aumatic-foil an improved aesthetic image is possible. Foil-technique enables the production of metal ceramic crowns with a compressive and shearing forces allowing the appliance to single crown in clinic use. In vitro measurement of the marginal leakage show a sufficient adaptation.

Explore related subjects

CrownsDental LeakageDental PorcelainGold AlloysHumansEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Fiedler. 1990. [Material study for Aumatic foil technique].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2100466/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Postcementation marginal fit of a new ceramic foil crown system.

The in vitro marginal fit of a new foil crown was investigated. Ten standardized polycarbonate master dies filled with 30 wt% carbon having a 90-degree butt joint margin were used to evaluate the marginal fit of Sunrise porcelain foil crowns. The crown specimens were made on stone dies and treated with three coats of die spacer. After fabrication, they were adjusted, cemented with zinc phosphate cement to their respective master dies with 5 kg loading for 10 minutes and stored in water. A Gaertner traveling microscope was used to measure the marginal fit of each specimen. Readings were recorded at five locations randomly marked but equally dividing the margin on each crown, and the overall mean for the crowns was then calculated. The results from the 50 areas revealed a mean marginal discrepancy of 25.3 microns, and this compared favorably with the discrepancies reported for other ceramic crown systems.

Crowns↗
PubMed1992

Pulpal evaluation of teeth restored with fixed prostheses.

The literature demonstrates that each of the elements of crown fabrication involves possible and probable insult to the pulpal tissues of the tooth. Preparation of the tooth can result in pulpal inflammation or even burn lesions. The impression technique can result in reduction of the odontoblastic layer caused by drying of the dentin. Temporary coverage of the preparation involves the use of self-curing resins and temporary cements, both of which can irritate the pulp. The final restoration is attached with cements that are often implicated in pulpal irritation. Dental caries and the procedures necessary to remove it and restore the tooth before preparation for a fixed prosthesis can injure the pulp. This study was done to evaluate the effects of complete coverage fixed prosthetic restorations on the dental pulp. A recall letter was mailed to 1221 patients who had received a fixed partial denture or single crown during the years 1984-1988. One hundred thirty patients were examined. Each tooth was evaluated for pulpal health, periodontal integrity, and clinical acceptability of the restoration. Of the 603 teeth examined, 166 had undergone root canal therapy before placement of the restoration, leaving 437 that were crowned while vital. Of these, 25 (5.7%) were in need of root canal therapy or had undergone root canal therapy after cementation of the fixed prosthesis.

Crowns↗