PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2105549

[What is cost effectiveness analysis?].

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is an established economical form of analysis which, in public services, replaces the marketing mechanism. The questions which CEA attempts to answer are: Which form of medical technology is most economically effective where a given disease is concerned. Where and how must the medical technology be commenced. Which group of patients can benefit from a given form of medical technology? It is a prerequisite for employment of CEA that there is unanimity in advance about the object of an activity, eg. a given treatment or procedure in the diagnostic investigation. Several strategies may be employed to ensure that the aim is sufficiently wide: the limits may be explicit; goals may be established which compare years of life with quality of life, or several goals may be present in the goal. The predominant economical expression in CEA is alternative costs which must be sacrificed in order to carry out a certain activity. In order to estimate what is obtained by carrying out an activity, an expression of effect is essential. These are most frequently both of quantitative and also of qualitative character and may be subdivided into three categories: Alterations in the employment of resources. Alterations in production by society. Alterations in the conditions of health of the individual. Doctors are important decisions-makers and distributors of resources in the health services. The questions which a CEA can provide graduated answers to, are the questions that the doctor works with in clinical practice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Alban, B Danneskiold-Samsøe, K M Pedersen. 1990-01-08. [What is cost effectiveness analysis?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2105549/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Low-cost on-the-job peer training of nurses improved immunization coverage in Indonesia.

In Indonesia responsibility for immunizations is placed on local government health centres and on the nurses who provide the immunizations at each centre. An on-the-job peer training programme for these nurses, which was designed to improve the immunization performance of poorly performing health centres in terms of coverage and practice in Maluku province, was evaluated. Experienced immunization nurses were sent to health centres where nurses were inexperienced or performing poorly; the experienced nurses spent 1-2 weeks providing on-the-job training for the less experienced ones. An evaluation of the 13 centres that participated in the programme and the 95 that did not found that the programme increased both immunization coverage and the quality of practice. Coverage of diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus (DPT), polio, and measles vaccinations rose by about 39% in all 13 participating centres when compared with non-participating centres, and by about 54% in the 11 centres that had a functioning transportation system during the year after training. These results reflect increases in the actual number of doses given and improvements in the accuracy of reports. Potential threats to the study's validity were examined and found not to be significant. The out-of-pocket cost of the training programme was about US$ 53 per trainee or about US$ 0.05 per additional vaccine reported to have been given. The marginal cost per additional fully immunized child was estimated to be US$ 0.50.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Home care.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗