PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2131759

[Therapeutical injunction].

Abstract

The opposition of specialists avoided the enforcement of the 1953 23rd december law settling the compulsory therapy of drug-addicted delinquents in France. So it was with the 1954 15th april law on the compulsory therapy of "dangerous alcoholics". The extend of drug-addictions led to the 1970 31st december law. But it was only in 1988-1989, that authorities give to the local agencies peremptory instructions for the enforcement of the so-called "therapeutical injunction" which the origin is judiciary. A survey published in 1990 allows a glimpse on the first data. Unfortunately, there are not reliable statistics on France, as a whole. Nevertheless, we know the difficulties better and better. For example, results obtained on ten cases, were favourable in only two cases. Its main advantage, emphasized by almost every medico-social team, is that the therapeutical injunction permits a first contact with a care service. Concerning the treatment of alcoholic patients, difficulties come, as D ENIKER has properly underlined, from the inadequacy of means at the departmental medical services, as a consequence of the suppression of former departmental health authorities. Sometimes, generalists have not a solid knowledge on drug-addicts and their psychotherapy. In the light of results obtained in other countries, it appears that we are on the way to success, provided that we help the local actors of this battle against the bane.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Vaille. 1990. [Therapeutical injunction].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2131759/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clarification of registration requirements for individual practitioners. Final rule.

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is amending its registration regulations to make it clear that when an individual practitioner practices in more than one State, he or she must obtain a separate DEA registration for each State. This amendment will make it easier for practitioners to understand the requirements of the Controlled Substances Act and its implementing regulations.

Drug and Narcotic Control↗

The legal status of medical marijuana.

OBJECTIVE: To review the legal status of medical marijuana in the US. DATA SOURCES: Relevant publications were located using LexisNexis (1982-October 2006), WestLaw (1996-October 2006), BNA Health Law Reporter (1996-October 2006), MEDLINE (1996-October 2006), EMBASE (1980-October 2006), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-October 2006), and an Internet search targeting government sites using the key words medical marijuana. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Federal and state medical marijuana laws were examined. Relevant cannabinoid-based drug products were reviewed. Federal and State Supreme Court and Appeal level cases involving medical marijuana were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Marijuana is regulated as a Schedule I controlled substance and its use is prohibited under federal law. Dronabinol and nabilone are synthetic cannabinoids approved by the Food and Drug Administration and Sativex is a cannabis-based extract being evaluated in Phase III trials. The federal government sponsors a single patient compassionate use Investigational New Drug Application program providing medical marijuana for a small number of patients. Eleven states permit marijuana use for medical purposes and one state provides a defense of medical necessity. Employers do not have to provide workplace accommodations for employees using medical marijuana and can terminate them at will. Healthcare providers have First Amendment constitutional protections that allow them to discuss marijuana with patients. CONCLUSIONS: Until the Supreme Court rules directly on the constitutionality of state medical marijuana laws, a conflict remains. Marijuana use remains illegal under federal law and states assume their medical marijuana laws to be constitutional.

Drug and Narcotic Control↗