PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2180214

The glycemic index.

Abstract

Different starchy foods produce different glycemic responses when fed individually, and there is evidence that this also applies in the context of the mixed meal. Methods of processing, and other factors unrelated to the nutrient composition of foods may also have major effects on the glycemic response. The reason for differences in glycemic response appears to relate to the rate at which the foods are digested and the many factors influencing this. The glycemic index (GI) is a system of classification in which the glycemic responses of foods are indexed against a standard (white bread). This allows the results of different investigators to be pooled. GI values also depend upon a number of nonfood-related variables. The method of calculation of the glycemic response area is most important, but the method of blood sampling and length of time of studies also may have effects. Variability of glycemic responses arises from day-to-day variation in the same subject and variation between different subjects. There is less variability between the GI values of different subjects than there is within the same subject from day to day. Therefore, the mean GI values of foods are independent of the glucose tolerance status of the subjects being tested. Potentially clinically useful starchy foods producing relatively flat glycemic responses have been identified, including legumes, pasta, barley, bulgur, parboiled rice and whole grain breads such as pumpernickel. Specific incorporation of these foods into diets have been associated with reduced blood glucose, insulin, and lipid levels. Low-GI foods may influence amino acid metabolism although the implications of these are unknown. In addition, low GI foods increase colonic fermentation. The physiologic and metabolic implications of this relate to increased bacterial urea utilization, and to the production and absorption of short chain fatty acids in the colon. The application of the GI to therapeutic diets should be in the context of the overall nutrient composition of the diet. High-fat or high-sugar foods may have a low GI, but it may not be prudent to recommend these foods solely on the basis of the GI. It is therefore suggested that the most appropriate use of the GI is to rank the glycemic effects of starchy foods which would already have been chosen for possible inclusion in the diet on the basis of their nutritional attributes, i.e. low-fat, unrefined carbohydrate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T M Wolever. 1990. The glycemic index.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2180214/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Intensive insulin therapy in critical care: a review of 12 protocols.

OBJECTIVE: To review performance characteristics of 12 insulin infusion protocols. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We systematically identify and compare 12 protocols and then apply the protocols to generate insulin recommendations in the management of a patient with hyperglycemia. The main focus involves a comparison of insulin doses and patterns of insulin administration. RESULTS: There is great variability in protocols. Areas of variation include differences in initiation and titration of insulin, use of bolus dosing, requirements for calculation in adjustment of the insulin infusion, and method of insulin protocol adjustments. Insulin recommendations for a sample patient are calculated to highlight differences between protocols, including the patterns and ranges of insulin dose recommended (range 27-115 units [mean +/- SD 66.7 +/- 27.9]), amount recommended for glucose readings >200 mg/dl, and adjustments nearing target glucose. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of consensus in the delivery of intravenous insulin infusions is reflected in the wide variability of practice noted in this survey. This mandates close attention to the choice of a protocol. One protocol may not suffice for all patients.

Blood Glucose↗

Metabolic improvement of male prisoners with type 2 diabetes in Fukushima Prison, Japan.

Imprisonment often improves metabolic control in prisoners with type 2 diabetes; however, the reasons for this remain unclear. Here, we investigated the metabolic control of male prisoners with type 2 diabetes in Japan. Retrospective analysis of 4385 medical charts of male prisoners in Fukushima Prison from 1998 to 2004 revealed 109 prisoners (all Asian) with type 2 diabetes (mean+/-S.D.: 51+/-10 years). All were followed up during their imprisonment (14+/-10 months). During imprisonment, mean fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin Alc (HbA1c) levels dramatically decreased from 184+/-74 to 113+/-38mg/dl (p<0.001) and 8.4+/-2.1 to 5.9+/-1.2% (p<0.001), respectively. In addition, 5 of 18 prisoners (28%) treated with insulin and 17 of 34 (50%) treated with oral hypoglycemic agents were able to discontinue their treatment and maintain good metabolic control. Most prisoners in Japanese prisons work 8h a day 5 days a week, consuming a high dietary fiber diet including boiled rice with barley, "Mugimeshi". These findings suggest that a well-regulated lifestyle and long-term intake of high dietary fiber may have beneficial effects on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Blood Glucose↗

Reduction in midthigh low-density muscle with aerobic exercise training and weight loss impacts glucose tolerance in older men.

CONTEXT: Intramuscular lipid content increases with aging and obesity and is directly related to impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the effects of aerobic exercise training (AEX) with and without weight loss (WL) on midthigh low-density muscle (LDM; a measure of im lipid) and whether changes in LDM impact glucose tolerance in sedentary older men. DESIGN: Forty-six men (60.4 +/- 1.1 yr) completed 6 months of AEX (n = 34) or AEX + WL (n = 12) and had oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) and computed tomography measures of LDM and regional abdominal and thigh fat depot areas. RESULTS: At baseline, LDM area directly correlated with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 120-min glucose (G(120)), and glucose area under the curve (G(AUC)) during an OGTT (r = 0.44, r = 0.51, and r = 0.54, respectively, P < 0.01). After the interventions, the AEX + WL group had greater decreases in LDM (-13.5 vs. +1.3%, respectively), FPG (-8.3 vs. +2.1%, respectively), G(120) (-22.5 vs. -3.6%, respectively), and G(AUC) (-17.3 vs. - 3.1%, respectively) than the AEX group. In the entire sample, the decreases in LDM correlated with reductions in FPG, G(120), and G(AUC) during an OGTT (r = 0.31, r = 0.34, and r = 0.41, P < 0.05). Changes in other regional fat depots did not independently correlate with glucose tolerance or insulin responses. CONCLUSION: AEX + WL is more efficacious than AEX for reducing LDM and glucose tolerance. The improvement in glucose tolerance may be partially mediated by decreases in LDM in older men.

Blood Glucose↗