PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2182989

Sulfapyridine and sulfones decrease glycosaminoglycans viscosity in dermatitis herpetiformis, ulcerative colitis, and pyoderma gangrenosum.

Abstract

Shortly after the introduction of sulfa drugs, sulfapyridine was found to have unique therapeutic properties, unrelated to antibacterial activity. Later, sulfones were found to share the same properties. The disorders initially improved were dermatitis herpetiformis, pyoderma gangrenosum, subcorneal pustular dermatosis, acrodermatitis continua, impetigo herpetiformis and ulcerative colitis. They were also sometimes helpful in many other disorders. They are effective in select disorders characterized by edema followed by granulocytic inflammation or edema followed by vesicle or bullae formation. The sulfones work in low doses in leprosy and their mode of action is not fully understood. Several pieces of experimental information are available. It is proposed that these drugs are entering or influencing the protein moiety of glycosaminoglycans and decreasing tissue viscosity. This decreased tissue viscosity prevents edema and dilution of tissue fluid and decreases acute inflammation and vesicle and bullae formation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O J Stone. 1990. Sulfapyridine and sulfones decrease glycosaminoglycans viscosity in dermatitis herpetiformis, ulcerative colitis, and pyoderma gangrenosum.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9877(90)90004-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparative in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of clofazimine and pyrifazimine against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in southwest China.

UNLABELLED: Clofazimine (CFZ) is a key drug used to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), while pyrifazimine (TBI-166) is an improved riminophenazine derivative with better pharmacokinetics. However, there is a lack of data on its susceptibility and resistance in regions with a high disease burden, such as southwestern China. We compared the in vitro antimicrobial activities of CFZ and TBI-166 against 249 DR-TB clinical isolates (99 multidrug-resistant TB [MDR-TB] and 150 pre-extensively drug-resistant TB [pre-XDR-TB] isolates) from southwestern China. TBI-166 exhibited a concentration-dependent biphasic antimicrobial pattern compared to CFZ. TBI-166 showed significantly greater potency at low concentrations (MIC&#x2085;&#x2080; = 0.031 &#xb5;g/mL TBI-166 vs 0.25 &#xb5;g/mL for CFZ; P < 0.001), but attenuated inhibition at high concentrations (MIC&#x2089;&#x2080; > 4 &#xb5;g/mL vs 1 &#xb5;g/mL for CFZ; P < 0.001). However, at high concentrations, the antibacterial effect of TBI-166 is weaker than that of CFZ (40% of TBI-166-resistant isolates have MIC > 4 &#xb5;g/mL, compared to 6.67% of CFZ-resistant isolates, P < 0.001). Epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) were 1.0 &#xb5;g/mL for CFZ and 0.25 &#xb5;g/mL for TBI-166. Based on these in vitro ECOFFs, the resistance rate to TBI-166 (20.1%, 50/249) was significantly higher than that to CFZ (6.0%, 15/249, P < 0.0001). Whole-genome sequencing revealed that mutations in Rv0678 were prevalent in dual-resistant isolates (10/14) and TBI-166 monoresistant isolates (5/40), while Rv1979c mutations were less frequent, and no pepQ mutations were detected. These mutations differed from known hotspots, suggesting potential novel resistance mechanisms. IMPORTANCE: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) remains a major global health challenge, and optimizing treatments for high-burden regions like southwest China is crucial. This study is the first to detail the differential in vitro activities of clofazimine (CFZ) and the novel TBI-166 against clinical DR-TB isolates from southwest China, alongside their resistance-associated genetic profiles. Findings show TBI-166 has enhanced low-concentration potency but higher resistance rates, plus novel mutations in Rv0678 and Rv1979c linked to resistance. These insights will help refine clinical regimens for DR-TB and strengthen regional resistance surveillance, both of which are essential for controlling the spread of DR-TB in southwest China and informing treatment and surveillance strategies in other similar high-burden areas globally.

Clofazimine

Novel mutations associated with clofazimine resistance in Mycobacterium intracellulare.

BACKGROUND: Clofazimine is a promising repurposed drug for treating Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex pulmonary disease, but its resistance mechanisms in Mycobacterium intracellulare remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to elucidate the resistance mechanisms of M. intracellulare to clofazimine. METHODS: We isolated 36 clofazimine-resistant M. intracellulare mutants in vitro and performed whole-genome sequencing to identify resistance-associated mutations. Gene complementation was used to validate the role of the identified mutations. RESULTS: We identified various mutations in the marR gene (WP_009952290.1) in 61% of clofazimine-resistant mutants by whole-genome sequencing. Mutations were identified in additional genes encoding ssuD (flavin-dependent oxidoreductase, C67A), lppI (membrane lipoprotein, C207 deletion), GMC oxidoreductase (glucose-methanol-choline oxidoreductase, G157 deletion), MASE1 domain-containing protein (C62G) and PPE family protein (222C deletion). Gene complementation experiments demonstrated that introducing the wild-type marR in clofazimine-resistant strain (L72) with marR mutations reduced clofazimine MIC from 1 mg/L to susceptible baseline (0.25 mg/L), confirming its critical role in clofazimine resistance. Notably, the M. intracellulare MarR lacks homology to Mycobacterium tuberculosis MarR family protein Rv0678 (MmpR) involved in clofazimine and bedaquiline resistance but is flanked by non-efflux pump genes (dhmA and doxX), and unlike M. tuberculosis, its mutation does not cause bedaquiline cross-resistance, indicating a different MarR and distinct regulatory mechanism for clofazimine resistance in M. intracellulare. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights marR as a key determinant of clofazimine resistance in M. intracellulare and underscores the need for further mechanistic studies with implications for rapid molecular detection and effective treatment.

Clofazimine

Ambulatory treatment of multibacillary leprosy with a regimen of 8 months duration.

An ambulatory treatment regimen for multibacillary leprosy, of 34 weeks duration composed of 8 weeks daily supervised rifampicin, ethionamide (ETH), dapsone (DDS) and clofazimine (CLO) followed by 26 weeks of unsupervised ETH, DDS and CLO, introduced in 1983 has been evaluated; 268 patients were followed for a mean of 4.4 years and a total of 1188 patient years. The relapse rate was 0.33 per 100 patient years of follow up. The reduction of the duration of the combined administration of RMP + ETH reduced the hepatotoxicity to 1.4%. It is possible that both phases of the regimen studied could still be reduced, however, in the near future ETH will be replaced by alternative bactericidal drugs, avoiding the hepatotoxicity.

Clofazimine