PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2195150

Plaque score changes based primarily on patient performance at specific time intervals.

Abstract

Patient plaque removal is a major component of periodontal therapy and should be continuously monitored during and following treatment. There do not appear to be studies which address plaque score changes achieved primarily by patient performance from the time of initial presentation to, during, and following active therapy. We assessed individual tooth surfaces and segment plaque scores for 24 adult subjects presenting with periodontitis, the majority of which was ADA case types III and IV, at 3 time points (initial presentation, post-initial preparation, and at 3 months following active therapy), using the O'Leary Plaque Index. The assessments describing surfaces and segments were made prior to any professional intervention. Analysis of buccal (B), interproximal (I), and lingual (L) plaque retentive surfaces at t-0 indicated the mean plaque index on B and L surfaces (30.7% and 41.9% respectively) was less than that on I surfaces (79.6%). At t-1 and t-2, the mean plaque index on all three surfaces was significantly (P less than 0.05) less than at t-0. Analysis of plaque indices in each of 6 segments at each time point revealed that plaque scores in all segments, except the mandibular right segment, were analogously reduced from t-0 to t-1 and to t-2. Our results indicate that plaque reduction for all subjects based primarily on patient performance consistently approaches or exceeds 50% on all surfaces and that interproximal surfaces present with and retain more plaque than buccal and lingual surfaces. Furthermore, patient plaque performance achieved at the time of post-initial preparation may be a predictor of the plaque control achievable during therapy based on patient performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C H DeVore, F M Beck, J E Horton. 1990. Plaque score changes based primarily on patient performance at specific time intervals.. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.6.343

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Meta-analyses of studies of 0.2% delmopinol mouth rinse as an adjunct to gingival health and plaque control measures.

BACKGROUND: Delmopinol is a third-generation anti-plaque agent used as a mouthwash to reduce plaque and alleviate gingivitis. OBJECTIVE: To create an overview of the anti-plaque efficacy of 0.2% delmopinol as an adjunct to normal oral hygiene measures by meta-analysis of completed clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight double-blind, parallel-group studies were identified. Study durations ranged from 8 to 24 weeks. Five studies (n=913) involved supervised rinsing; three studies (n=467) involved unsupervised rinsing. These sets of trials were analysed separately and in combination. Efficacy outcomes comprised modified plaque index, modified gingival index (MGI) and gingival bleeding on probing (BOP). RESULTS: Delmopinol 0.2% was superior to placebo for the reduction of plaque scores in both sets of studies. Effects on MGI and BOP were also better with delmopinol 0.2% than with placebo. In most instances, 95% confidence intervals were wholly in favour of delmopinol. Pooled analysis of all eight studies confirmed statistically significant effects of delmopinol 0.2% compared with placebo (p<0.00001). Delmopinol met the efficacy criteria of the American Dental Association in studies of extended duration. CONCLUSION: Delmopinol 0.2% mouthwash is effective as an adjunct measure for reducing plaque burden and indices of gingivitis, whether or not it is used under supervision.

Dental Plaque↗

A review of the effects of stannous fluoride on gingivitis.

AIM: To review the literature on the effects of stannous fluoride on gingivitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Medline and cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched up to August 2005 to identify appropriate studies. The primary outcome measure was gingivitis. RESULTS: Independent screening of titles and abstracts of 542 papers resulted in 36 publications (inter-reviewer ê score of 0.76), out of which 15 papers finally fulfilled the criteria of eligibility. For SnF(2)dentifrices, a statistically significant reduction in gingivitis was noted in comparison with control (weighted mean difference (WMD) of 0.15 (gingival index) and 0.21 (gingivitis severity index) (test for heterogeneity p<0.00001, I(2)=91.1% and p=0.03, I(2)=80.1%, respectively)). With regard to plaque reduction inconsistent results existed. On using the plaque index no differences were found, whereas meta-analysis of the Turesky index provided a WMD of 0.31 (p=0.01, test for heterogeneity p<0.0001, I(2)=91.7%). Because of insufficient data, a meta-analysis for SnF(2)mouth rinse and dentifrice/mouthrinse formulations was not performed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SnF(2) dentifrices results in gingivitis and plaque reduction when compared with a conventional dentifrice. The precise magnitude of this effect was difficult to assess because of a high level of heterogeneity in study outcomes.

Dental Plaque↗