PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2201071

Zidovudine intolerance.

Abstract

Patients may be intolerant of zidovudine for several reasons, the most prominent being hematologic toxicity. In vitro studies demonstrate that zidovudine is toxic to the myeloid and erythroid precursors in the bone marrow; at concentrations of zidovudine near those associated with the optimal antiviral effect in vitro, the proliferative capability of these progenitor cells is reduced 50%-70%. The clinical manifestations of anemia and leukopenia generally are time- and dose-dependent. Strategies for alleviating the hematologic toxicity of zidovudine include the use of hematopoietic growth factors, such as erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Myopathy, a recently recognized toxic effect of zidovudine, also appears to be time-dependent. Patients often complain of muscle weakness and discomfort and exhibit an associated elevation in creatine phosphokinase level; dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy generally is required. Some patients have experienced high fever, nausea, and vomiting; however, these effects are unusual and of unclear etiology. The substantial proportion of patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex receiving zidovudine who experience hematologic or muscular toxicity may benefit from treatment with new antiviral agents, such as dideoxyinosine, with toxicity profiles different from that of zidovudine.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J E Groopman. Zidovudine intolerance.. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids%2F12.supplement_5.s500

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Single cell mutational analysis of PIK3CA in circulating tumor cells and metastases in breast cancer reveals heterogeneity, discordance, and mutation persistence in cultured disseminated tumor cells from bone marrow.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic decisions in cancer are generally guided by molecular biomarkers or, for some newer therapeutics, primary tumor genotype. However, because biomarkers or genotypes may change as new metastases emerge, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood are being investigated for a role in guiding real-time drug selection during disease progression, expecting that CTCs will comprehensively represent the full spectrum of genomic changes in metastases. However, information is limited regarding mutational heterogeneity among CTCs and metastases in breast cancer as discerned by single cell analysis. The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow also carry prognostic significance in breast cancer, but with variability between CTC and DTC detection. Here we analyze a series of single tumor cells, CTCs, and DTCs for PIK3CA mutations and report CTC and corresponding metastatic genotypes. METHODS: We used the MagSweeper, an immunomagnetic separation device, to capture live single tumor cells from breast cancer patients' primary and metastatic tissues, blood, and bone marrow. Single cells were screened for mutations in exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene. Captured DTCs grown in cell culture were also sequenced for PIK3CA mutations. RESULTS: Among 242 individual tumor cells isolated from 17 patients and tested for mutations, 48 mutated tumor cells were identified in three patients. Single cell analyses revealed mutational heterogeneity among CTCs and tumor cells in tissues. In a patient followed serially, there was mutational discordance between CTCs, DTCs, and metastases, and among CTCs isolated at different time points. DTCs from this patient propagated in vitro contained a PIK3CA mutation, which was maintained despite morphological changes during 21 days of cell culture. CONCLUSIONS: Single cell analysis of CTCs can demonstrate genotypic heterogeneity, changes over time, and discordance from DTCs and distant metastases. We present a cautionary case showing that CTCs from any single blood draw do not always reflect metastatic genotype, and that CTC and DTC analyses may provide independent clinical information. Isolated DTCs remain viable and can be propagated in culture while maintaining their original mutational status, potentially serving as a future resource for investigating new drug therapies.

Bone Marrow↗

Trisomy 8 as sole cytogenetic abnormality in a case of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

A 49-year-old man, who had been diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in 2002, had a normal karyotype in his bone marrow. Trisomy 8 was demonstrated in his peripheral blood in 2005. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using an LSI CEP 8 probe performed on the archival bone marrow specimen showed three hybridization signals in 40% of 200 interphase cells scored. This confirmed that the trisomy 8 abnormality was present in both the blood and bone marrow samples. Trisomy 8 as the sole chromosomal abnormality in CLL is a very rare finding. The prognostic significance of trisomy 8 in CLL remains to be seen.

Bone Marrow↗