PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2213640

Schizophrenic performance on line bisection: no simple lateralization defects.

Abstract

Many studies have assessed the possible lateralization deficits of schizophrenics, and the results usually suggest left hemisphere dysfunction. Nevertheless, they have been variable. This may have been due to cognitive demand of the different tasks, not to changes in brain lateralization itself. In order to circumvent this problem, the present study evaluates the performance of schizophrenics on a simple but lateralized task, line bisection. Subjects bisected a line using either visual or tactile information, with the left or right hand, when it was placed in their left or right hemispace or directly in front of them. Schizophrenic subjects were not more erroneous than normals (variable error), nor were they biased differently from normals in either direction with either modality of sensory input (constant error). There were only two significant effects of group on the tactile line bisection, one of position x length x group and one of position x hand x end x length x group, both on constant error (directional bias). The lack of main effects and presence of interactions on these basic tasks suggests that apparent lateralization differences found in schizophrenic subjects are due not to a simple defect of brain lateralization but may stem from task demands and attention allocation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Mather, R W Neufeld, H Merskey, N C Russell. 1990. Schizophrenic performance on line bisection: no simple lateralization defects.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(90)90058-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space.

Although attention plays a significant role in vision, its spatial deployment and spread in the third dimension is not well understood. In visual search experiments we show that we cannot easily focus attention across isodepth loci unless they are part of a well-formed surface with locally coplanar elements. Yet we can easily spread our attention selectively across well-formed surfaces that span an extreme range of stereoscopic depths. In cueing experiments, we show that this spread of attention is, in part, obligatory. Attentional selectivity is reduced when targets and distractors are coplanar with or rest on a common receding stereoscopic plane. We conclude that attention cannot be efficiently allocated to arbitrary depths and extents in space but is linked to and spreads automatically across perceived surfaces.

Attention

Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction.

Positron emission tomography was used to measure changes in the regional cerebral blood flow of normal people while they searched visual displays for targets defined by color, by motion, or by a conjunction of color and motion. A region in the superior parietal cortex was activated only during the conjunction task, at a location that had previously been shown to be engaged by successive shifts of spatial attention. Correspondingly, the time needed to detect a conjunction target increased with the number of items in the display, which is consistent with the use of a mechanism that successively analyzes each item in the visual field.

Attention

Attention-generated apparent motion.

Motion perception mechanisms have recently been divided into three categories. First-order mechanisms primarily extract motion from moving objects or features that differ from the background in luminance. Second-order mechanism extract motion from moving properties, such as a moving area of flicker in which there is no difference in mean luminance between target and background. These first- and second-order motion mechanisms are primarily monocular. The existence of purely binocular, interocular and various other unusual kinds of apparent motion has promoted conjectures of a third-order mechanism, but there has been no clear suggestion as to the actual computations that such a mechanism might perform. Here we demonstrate 'alternating feature' stimuli that produce apparent motion only when the observer selectively attends to one of the embedded features in the display. The latent motion in the alternating feature stimuli is invisible to first- or second-order motion mechanisms, and the direction of apparent motion depends on the particular feature attended. These findings suggest the mechanism of third-order motion: the locations of the most significant features are registered in a salience map, and motion is computed directly from this map.

Attention