PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2226111

Devices for insulin administration.

Abstract

There is a significant need for revised, safe, and more effective insulin-delivery methods than subcutaneous injections in the treatment of both type I (insulin-dependent) and type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. The aim of this review is to describe the rationale and methods for better use of injection and infusion devices for intensive insulin therapy and to describe results of animal and human research that will lead to an implantable artificial pancreas. Injection devices, e.g., jet injectors, insulin pens, and access ports, cannot be considered as a major breakthrough in the quest for improved control, although they may improve the patient's comfort. External pumps have benefits over multiple injections and conventional insulin therapy only in specific subgroups of patients, e.g., those with recurrent severe hypoglycemia, but only when used by experienced personnel. The external artificial pancreas (Biostator) is also to be used by experienced personnel for limited clinical and research applications, e.g., surgery of the diabetic patient. The development of an implantable version of the artificial pancreas is linked to progress in the field of reliable long-duration glucose sensors. Finally, programmable implantable insulin pumps, used as an open-loop delivery system, are the most promising alternative to intensive subcutaneous insulin strategies in the short term, although clear evidence of improved safety and efficacy remains to be documented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Selam, M A Charles. 1990. Devices for insulin administration.. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.13.9.955

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Pancreatin therapy in patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency according to low fecal elastase 1 concentrations. Results of a prospective multi-centre trial.

BACKGROUND: Recently, high prevalence of exocrine dysfunction in diabetic populations has been reported. Patients with fecal elastase 1 concentration (FEC) <100 microg/g have also been demonstrated to suffer from steatorrhea in about 60% of cases, indicating the need of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. Until now, there have only been a few reports on the use of enzyme replacement therapy in diabetic patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. This investigation was designed to evaluate the impact of enzyme-replacement therapy on glucose metabolism and diabetes treatment in a prospective study of insulin-treated patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A total of 546 patients with diabetes mellitus requiring insulin treatment were screened for exocrine dysfunction by FEC measurements. One hundred and fifteen patients (21.1%) had FEC <100 microg/g (normal >200 microg/g). Of these, 95 patients entered the study and 80 patients were randomized to receive either pancreatin (Creon) (39 patients) or placebo (41 patients) in a double-blind manner. Parameters of glucose metabolism, diabetes therapy and clinical symptoms were recorded in standardized protocols for 16 weeks. RESULTS: During the observation phase of 16 weeks, there were no significant differences between both groups concerning HbA(1c), fasting glucose levels, 2-h pp glucose levels, clinical parameters and safety parameters. A reduction in mild and moderate hypoglycemia was observed in the pancreatin group at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatin therapy can be used safely in patients with diabetes mellitus and exocrine dysfunction. Parameters of glucose metabolism were not improved by enzyme replacement therapy.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1↗